Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ClancyJ
We need to think of how we would speak if trying to sell our views to a boss.

we're not trying to sell these clowns anything. They are trying to sell us a bill of goods.

When you realize a salesman is defrauding you, you stop playing nice and you pick him up by the seat of his pants and throw him into the street.

They tried to sneak this one by us in the dark of night.

BTW Bush has lost all credibility by sending his cronies out to try to convince us that this Amnesty bill is not an Amnesty Bill. Why should I give a crap if they don't give me any credibility? I'm not trying to sell them anything. I'm trying to tar and feather them all and run them out of town on a rail. That is how Americans have traditionally treated flim flam men. We need to let these Bozos know who is the boss and where they can put their Amnesty plan.

Hey Jorge, if you are lurking:


1,268 posted on 06/14/2007 10:10:45 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1216 | View Replies ]


To: P-Marlowe

AMEN X 1,000!


1,275 posted on 06/14/2007 10:13:47 PM PDT by Travis McGee (--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1268 | View Replies ]

To: P-Marlowe; Tony Snow

He is still the president. Christians are to show respect.

However, I entirely support your view that we have been offered flim flam.

Close the border first, Mr. President. Totally, and without leaks.

Who is the contractor and when is the start and finish dates?


1,291 posted on 06/14/2007 10:18:20 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1268 | View Replies ]

To: P-Marlowe

Very funny - is that a Freeper?


1,320 posted on 06/14/2007 10:37:39 PM PDT by ClancyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1268 | View Replies ]

To: P-Marlowe

Exactly. The Bush administration is attempting to blackmail us into accepting amnesty by withholding enforcement of existing laws. The chief law enforcement officer of this country refusing to enforce laws until he gets his own pet project passed? It’s beyond disgraceful — it’s unConstitutional in a lot of different ways.

Now they think that somehow they’re going to encourage us to support this by promising to throw around more of OUR money???

The laws they need to stop illegal immigration and enforce border security are already on the books. The appropriations for those laws have, or should have, aleady been made. Where is the money that was appropriated for enforcement that is not being carried out? Why would they need an emergency spending bill for this?

The answer, of course, is obvious. They have no intention of curbing illegal immigration or meaningfully enforcing border security. Furthermore, they obviously had no intention of building meaningful enforcement into this new bill — or they wouldn’t have to tack on more enforcement to sweeten the pot.

I will not speak to these clowns as if they were my bosses. I’ll speak to them as the hucksters that they’ve proved themselves to be.


1,410 posted on 06/15/2007 12:34:23 AM PDT by ellery (I don't remember a constitutional amendment that gives you the right not to be identified-R.Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1268 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson