Hillary and Porn

Concerned Women For America ^ | June 13, 2007 | By Sarah Rode

[Fledermaus]

Isn’t that her blow-up doll line?

[Mr. Silverback]

Any proposed Amendment should elaborate on what is specifically NOT protected speech.

So...there's not a pro-porn amendment?

And don't give me that hate speech jazz. It is perfectly acceptable to have limits on speech if those limits are necessary for public safety, like bans on sedition, incitement to riot, yellign "Fire" in a crowded theater as a joke, etc. The fact that someone takes that clear, strict Constructionist concept and tries to make it a tool for oppression does not mean there should be no limits on speech. It means that bad people will abuse government, which is exactly what the Framers predicted.

[jdm]

Isn’t that her blow-up doll line?

I'm not sure. Mine got lost in the mail. :O)