where did you come up with that...that the creation theory predictions cannot be the same with any of the evolution predictions for it to be a thoery? If you honestly look at the science of creationism, there is much there. It does not impede faith to see that because the darkness is always working in our thoughts regardless of the evidence. That’s where we faith...to not fight the evil in our minds but watch it and let God to it. It’s already been defeated anyways.
>>where did you come up with that...that the creation theory predictions cannot be the same with any of the evolution predictions for it to be a thoery? If you honestly look at the science of creationism, there is much there. It does not impede faith to see that because the darkness is always working in our thoughts regardless of the evidence. That’s where we faith...to not fight the evil in our minds but watch it and let God to it. It’s already been defeated anyways.<<
That’s just the definition of “useful theory” in science.
Thus far, no useful theories either in that sense or in the sense of having practical usefulness are creation based.
That would be a good step if creationists want creationism to be accepted as science - to come up with physical events that are predicted only by their creation theories.