Posted on 06/13/2007 5:49:05 AM PDT by tlb
The Gore boomlet betrays subterranean tremors of doubt. After two major televised debates by both parties, only a Pollyanna on helium would believe that any of the top-tier Democrats will definitely be able to defeat a leading Republican like Mitt Romney or Rudy Giuliani.
What was surfacing in Hillary was the old family psychodrama of the bright, brittle, high-achieving daughter contemptuously outflanking her befuddled, resentful, mediocre brothers at the dinner table. It wasn't a pleasant sight -- and all too reminiscent of the bullying Rosie O'Donnell compulsively hogging the spotlight on "The View."
The second Republican debate, in contrast, overflowed with spontaneous energy.
I continue to be alarmed at what I perceive as Republican momentum toward next year's national election. Democrats are already acquiring a dismaying reputation for underestimating the threat of global terrorism.
When Joe Biden tried to break out of captivity by boldly addressing the live audience, Hillary tried to match him by instantly raising her voice and keeping it at that abrasive level.
Nevertheless, Hillary's abundant negatives don't make a Gore candidacy any more attractive. Gore is a mass of frustrated yearnings and self-defeating vacillation.
What exactly were Gore's achievements in his eight years as vice president? What steps did he take at the time to shape public policy on global warming? What did the Clinton administration do to win U.S. adoption of the Kyoto accords? (Answer: next to nothing.)
Democrats who long for his return as the anti-Hillary may not realize how Gore has become a risible cartoon character for much of the country at large.
(Excerpt) Read more at salon.com ...
“She is a unapologetic liberal unlike Hillary “
I give her credit for intellectual honesty, although we usually come to different conclusions about public policy. The annoying thing about CP is that she often writes in a dense, academic fashion, as if to show how learned she is and how dumb the audience is.
BTW, I agree with MIchael Medved’s surmise that Algore is psychologically disturbed. I hope he runs because the pressure will make him unravel in public.
Schadenfreude is terrible, but I cannot resist.
-—Right now, the Democrats’ best hope may be for the Republicans to veer right and nominate an erratic aging boy like the seedy Newt Gingrich or a Hollywood caricature of vintage 1910 American small-town life like the phlegmatically pithy Fred Thompson, whose homespun act feels tired and looks tired.-—
I fully agree with her on this point, which is why I think Romney is perhaps our best hope if the President doesn’t bury the party in the meantime.
manbearpig ping
manbearpig ping
Run as a Green, Al! Run as a Green!
Paglia is an intellectual Ann Coulter on another reservation. I like reading her. Thanks for posting.
Damn! That lesbo can write!
Just say NO to Amnesty!! Keep calling!! Its NOT OVER!!
U.S. Senate switchboard: (202) 224-3121
U.S. House switchboard: (202) 225-3121
White House comments: (202) 456-1111
Find your House Rep.: http://www.house.gov/writerep
Find your US Senators: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
I missed that one. Do you have a link?
I seriously doubt he would do this, but a Bloomberg/Gore ticket would get a lot of votes. Bloomberg has no appeal outside of the leftist NYC area, but Gore could do damage nationwide. It would comprise the far left of the dems with a lot of "conservative" dems. Plus lots of independants. Virtually no republicans, but they may not need them to win. BTW, interesting to read the comments from liberals to her article. They really HATE her for pointing out the obvious about the current crop of democrats. They ignore Paglia's advice at their own peril. Leftists obviously think that the candidates aren't liberal enough. And that America just "can't wait" to elect an uber-liberal to the highest office, even someone with absolutely no qualifications, like Obama or Hillary. Richardson is the only one who could plausibly claim executive experience.
Thanks for posting this. She is usually a good read even if she is a leftie.
And they have a mirror image, right here on FR:
"FReepers obviously think that the candidates aren't conservative enough. And that America just "can't wait" to elect an uber-conservative to the highest office, even someone with absolutely no qualifications, like Hunter or Tancredo. Huckabee is the only one who could plausibly claim executive experience." ;)
Yea, and that his obnoxious behavior will make obvious to many the absurdity of his position on Global-Warming, which all of the Demonrats are now committed to.
Reflecting on all the reasons that the rats don't want him to run I can only think, Run Al Run!
What a joke.
Algore is biding his time, keeping his powder dry, while the Clinton-Obama-Edwards Axis of Weevils tears itself apart and turns off the voting public. Come Fall, Algore will win the Nobel Peace Prize. Resurgent interest in his being First in war, First in peace, First in global warming, will create a wave of rock-star enthusiasm he will not be able to refuse.
Algore never heard of Camille Paglia and wouldn't have the sense to take her seriously if he had.
Very good article by Camille Paglia.
Run Algore Run!
Interesting. I have to admit you’re right!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.