>You and I may well think the way he has dealt with the border issues is ‘criminal’, but it still boils down to a policy difference at its base.<
I believe the oath of office says something about protecting the nation against the enemy foreign and domestic. He has broken that oath by opening our border to those enemies, and leaving them open, even when the nation has complained to him. He has signed a treaty, the NAU, dissolving our sovereignty. The NAU is surely unconstitutional. I don’t consider those things ‘policy issues’. More like perjury?
He has broken that oath by opening our border to those enemies, and leaving them open