Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State argues: No freedom [for imprisoned punk]
Atlanta Journal-Constitution ^ | 06/12/07 | Jeremy Redmon

Posted on 06/12/2007 1:32:21 PM PDT by madprof98

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last
To: Alter Kaker
Civil rights crowd is a euphemism for really debased folks who havn’t any idea as to how life is, much less how to survive and better it on their own. This guy used date rape drugs and booze on the girls (as did his so-called “friends”) and he was offered-before his trial-and during his trial-a reduced charge for his guilty plea. He, and his dumbassed Mother rejected the plea bargain, went to trial, and lost! Is 10 years too much? Not in my book, especially when they used drugs to have their way. Just because he is a “smart” kid doesn’t erase the fact he is basically lacking any social or personal responsibilities for his sexual conquests of innocent young teenaged girls. Get all of the facts before you throw out the baby with the bathwater, it does all of us no good to be so accusatory in your postings.
21 posted on 06/12/2007 1:59:13 PM PDT by geezerwheezer (get up boys, we're burnin' daylight!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker
I see a difference between a 45 year old videotaping a 15 year old and a 16 or 17 year old doing the same. Do you?

The issue is the victim's age, not the perp's age.

22 posted on 06/12/2007 1:59:43 PM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002
I feel sure we will hear from him again.

When he graduates from Harvard? I mean, why not? The media have been promoting him as a college-bound paragon who just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time--that place and time being the videotaped orgy with girls too drugged up to know what was happening.

23 posted on 06/12/2007 1:59:48 PM PDT by madprof98 ("moritur et ridet" - salvianus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: infowarrior
I'm having a bit of trouble with this "consensual" label. At age 15, the girl in question cannot legally give "consent", so it isn't "consensual".

That's a legalistic way of weaseling out of an answer. Do you think kids suddenly become wise to the ways of the world on their 16th birthday? Would you prosecute a girl two days after her 16th birthday for having sex with her boyfriend who doesn't turn 16 for another week? To me, that seems a little strange, but I'm genuinely interested in an explanation.

I discover that others were convicted of sexual battery on the the other girl.

But not this kid, an honor student and a star athlete, who was nevertheless sentenced to 10 years in prison. Odd.

24 posted on 06/12/2007 2:01:25 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
"I just got off the phone with him," B.J. Bernstein...

The lawyer representing the kid who was imprisoned for oral sex is named BJ? Oh, the irony! :0)

25 posted on 06/12/2007 2:01:34 PM PDT by Cowboy Bob (Withhold Taxes - Starve a Liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

There was an earlier case where a 17 year old girl packed her bags and went with a bunch of kids. This boy was among them. she got loaded, high etc. It was videotaped. The girl cried rape the next morning to her Mom. All the boys but this kid pleaded out-they were threatened with 25 year sentences. This kid would not. It went to trial and he was acquitted. This 15 year old girl was his girlfriend. There is lots of underage sex going on, you are going to need many jails if it is a crime.


26 posted on 06/12/2007 2:02:46 PM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker
I’m having trouble following your argument.

So go do something else.

27 posted on 06/12/2007 2:02:49 PM PDT by madprof98 ("moritur et ridet" - salvianus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

I think punk is a good description of a young man that raped a 17 year old girl (he got off since she was too intoxicated to identify him) and got a gang bang BJ from a 15 year old while his Posse recorded it on a cameraphone.

What word would you choose?

Now, picture it is your 15 year old daughter, now what word would you use.


28 posted on 06/12/2007 2:03:50 PM PDT by JayHawk Phrenzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
The issue is the victim's age, not the perp's age.

Really? Because if two high school kids have sex and during the course of the relationship one turns sixteen you want to prosecute him or her for rape? I'm not sure I follow. The whole idea of statutory rape is an implicit power dynamic -- I'm not sure I see that in this or similar cases.

29 posted on 06/12/2007 2:04:25 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: geezerwheezer

No point bothering these people with the facts. They got their “facts” from the newspapers. Their “honor student” is the type who drugs girls and screws them on camera, but so what? I mean, he’s an “honor student.”


30 posted on 06/12/2007 2:05:19 PM PDT by madprof98 ("moritur et ridet" - salvianus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker
Why should he accept a plea deal in order to allow the AG to save face?

The AG is duty-bound to enforce the laws of the state. It has nothing to do with 'saving face'.

Why was he even arrested, let alone charged, in the first place?

Because he broke the law, and then put it out in a video for all to see.

The law can be changed, but in the meantime, this kid screwed up, and now he's ticked off that he's paying the price for his screw up (even though he was offered a deal so it would go easier on him).

Initially, I thought this sentence was unfair. Now that I've learned more about it, I figure the kid caused his own problems and have no sympathy for him.

31 posted on 06/12/2007 2:06:35 PM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: John D
I also do not think it is possible to explain it to a red neck racist.

I never used to understand why Rudy Giuliani had so many ardent supporters on this forum. I think I understand now.

32 posted on 06/12/2007 2:07:31 PM PDT by madprof98 ("moritur et ridet" - salvianus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: JayHawk Phrenzie

Now, picture it is your 15 year old daughter, now what word would you use.
**********************************************************************************************************************
How about whore? She gave him oral sex. How many 17 year olds would turn it down. The jails would be filled with 17 year olds if this was prosecuted very often.


33 posted on 06/12/2007 2:09:47 PM PDT by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker
What I am saying is, take the *whole* matter into context. With the other charges and convictions, on such things as sexual battery and false imprisonment, this idea that it was just a consensual matter between those two individuals is shaky at best. Some very untowards things happened at that New Years Eve party, and the "consent" might not have been as strictly "consenual" as you're making it out to be.

I'm not weaseling out of anything, I don't have enough *FACT* at hand to make a determination as to whether or not this consent was truly consent, or was born of some other factor, though the possiblity for other factors is apparently in play with the few facts I do know. Thus, my determination comes from the law, as it is written. If that makes me "legalistic", then so be it...

the infowarrior

34 posted on 06/12/2007 2:10:27 PM PDT by infowarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: JayHawk Phrenzie
I think punk is a good description of a young man that raped a 17 year old girl

So he wasn't identified but you still want him behind bars? How do you know it was him? Is it just me, or is this vendetta against this kid seeming a little ridiculous. Note that the 15 year old in question in THIS CASE says that everything was consensual. Now I'm not saying I'd like this kid or want him around my daughters, but putting him in prison for a consensual act with someone essentially his own age seems utterly absurd.

35 posted on 06/12/2007 2:11:13 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: madprof98

What does Rudy Giuliani have to do with you being a red neck racist?


36 posted on 06/12/2007 2:11:37 PM PDT by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: madprof98

This PUNK turned down this deal:

As recently as this past weekend, the Douglas County District Attorney’s office offered Genarlow Wilson’s attorneys a plea deal that would have allowed Genarlow Wilson to plead to First Offender Treatment, which would mean that he would not have a criminal record nor would he be subject to registering on the sex-offender registry once his sentence had been completed. The plea deal, if accepted by Genarlow Wilson’s lawyers, could also result in Genarlow Wilson receiving a sentence substantially shorter than the 10-year mandatory minimum sentence for which he was originally sentenced, possibly leading to his release based upon time already served. Genarlow Wilson, through his attorneys, rejected all of those offers. The District Attorney’s office has indicated that the plea offer will remain available to Genarlow Wilson notwithstanding the appeals process.

Sounds like he should serve 8 more years.

Respect for the law <> Racism, if you really feel that way go here:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/

You will be far more comfortable there.


37 posted on 06/12/2007 2:11:59 PM PDT by JayHawk Phrenzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: John D

He’s calling you a left wing troll, but in a oblique way.

Judging from your posts in this thread, that is a correct designation.


38 posted on 06/12/2007 2:13:15 PM PDT by JayHawk Phrenzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Lance Romance
a 15 year old cannot consent to anything

I was just reading the other thread about the 12 year old who plotted and followed through on killing her parents and 8 year old brother to be with her 22 year old boyfriend. Seems like we don't give these "kids" enough credit for what they are capable of consenting to.

39 posted on 06/12/2007 2:13:23 PM PDT by JTHomes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: John D

Giuliani’s followers are the kind of people who substitute PC name-calling for morals and values. What if the punk were white? What name would you call me then?


40 posted on 06/12/2007 2:14:04 PM PDT by madprof98 ("moritur et ridet" - salvianus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson