Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nmh

I agree, and there is massive evidence for a world wide flood.


25 posted on 06/11/2007 2:25:23 PM PDT by JSDude1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: JSDude1
I agree, and there is massive evidence for a world wide flood.

Sorry, that happens not to be the case. Most experts place the flood at about 4350 years ago, and that is a time period that is well known to archaeologists (note: archaeologists, not geologists).

If there was such massive evidence it would be easy to find. It has not been found. Instead, there is massive evidence that no such global flood occurred at about 4350 years ago.

61 posted on 06/11/2007 2:40:40 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1
I agree, and there is massive evidence for a world wide flood.

Question for you. About 97% of all the water on the planet is salt water. If it rained enough to flood the entire surface of the planet to a depth of tens of thousands of feet then all that salt water mixed with the fresh water and polluted it. So what did Noah drink once all the water receded?

127 posted on 06/11/2007 3:15:06 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson