Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dog Gone
Answers to questions, as follows:
  1. Introductory biology textbooks stress how difficult it is for a fossil to be created. Soft parts (e.g. tissues) typically don’t last the test of time. Conditions also play a key role. That’s why we have a lot of fossils of organisms that were hard-shelled. Carbon dating reveals the ages of these organisms, which are often in the millions of years as opposed to young-earth creationist’s thousands of years time span.
  2. Natural selection.
  3. The question is clearly worded from a young-earth perspective. Dinosaurs died out sixty-five million years ago. We haven’t been around for that long. There are no human remains embedded in the same rock strata as the dinosaurs because we didn’t live together. People who ask questions like this must have loved the Flintstones as kids.

None of that matters to the people who will not accept evolution as a reasonable explanation.

That’s unfortunate.

I’m libertarian anyway. I shouldn't be grouped with the “Noah’s Ark Republicans.” I thank my parents for never sending me to Sunday School. I’ve actually read the New Testament as a consequence.

178 posted on 06/11/2007 4:17:54 PM PDT by Abd al-Rahiim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]


To: Abd al-Rahiim
Carbon dating reveals the ages of these organisms, which are often in the millions of years as opposed to young-earth creationist’s thousands of years time span.

Slight correction: Radiocarbon dating goes back only about 50,000 years. Other forms of radiometric dating can date things much older.

182 posted on 06/11/2007 4:26:26 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson