Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman

look around you next time you go “fossil hunting”: the “layers of sediment” all over the world show evidence of a world-wide flood!

Why would there be fossils on even some of the highest peaks (that are confirmed not to have been recent volcanoes) in the world? Why has there been miles of supposedly (dated by evolutionists) ‘old rock’ on top of ‘younger rock’. See second post for more evidence!


155 posted on 06/11/2007 3:35:22 PM PDT by JSDude1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: JSDude1

Nice retort.
My uncle who was an atheist became a (gasp here) a born again Christian after he received his geology BS and started research into his PhD, by the time he was awarded his degree he was (gasp again) an anti-evolutionist scientist. He says the evidence for “The Flood” is overwhelming.
He has given lectures using geological records to preach the Word.


161 posted on 06/11/2007 3:48:24 PM PDT by svcw (There is no plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1
look around you next time you go “fossil hunting”: the “layers of sediment” all over the world show evidence of a world-wide flood!

Why would there be fossils on even some of the highest peaks (that are confirmed not to have been recent volcanoes) in the world? Why has there been miles of supposedly (dated by evolutionists) ‘old rock’ on top of ‘younger rock’. See second post for more evidence!

Why would I want to go fossil hunting? Fossils have nothing to do with a global flood at about 4350 years ago!

For that age you deal with archaeologists (of which I am one) and sedimentologists.

There is continuity of culture and DNA in many areas of the world (for example, Egypt). If there had been a global flood at about 4350 years ago, those cultures would have been disrupted, and their DNA would have been replaced by that of the Near East.

There is likewise no worldwide sediment (soil) layer at 4350 years ago. Such a flood is sure to have left evidence. If you want to see evidence of a large flood, google "channeled scablands" and see what a series of late Ice Age floods to parts of Washington state.

This is why the early geologists (all creationists) gave up on trying to prove a global flood by about 1830. The evidence was simply not there.

169 posted on 06/11/2007 4:01:00 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1
Why would there be fossils on even some of the highest peaks (that are confirmed not to have been recent volcanoes) in the world?

Is that a serious question? Go look up a little scientific theory called plate tectonics.

As for evidence against a world wide flood, if one existed, we should expect to find a uniform layer of mud and silt all over the world. We don't.

266 posted on 06/12/2007 8:08:35 AM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson