To: Moose4; Allegra
So the fact that Ron Paul supported the “cut and run” resolution, doesn’t factor into the 100% deal there???
But before you and a few others get steamed at me for apparently disrespecting Dr. Paul, just sit back and think about I really said just now...
It’s one thing to be a principled legislator (which he is), but being recklessly principled alienates you from your constituency...And he has done that this time...
Thats why he has some serious challenges in the district this time around...
142 posted on
06/11/2007 8:12:15 AM PDT by
stevie_d_64
(Houston Area Texans (I've always been hated))
To: stevie_d_64
Thats why he has some serious challenges in the district this time around...
Ron Paul has taken everything that both parties can throw at him in previous elections.
Bring it on. We thought we'd taught both parties a lesson back in '06 when neither would run a candidate against him but apparently they haven't learned yet.
195 posted on
06/11/2007 8:55:28 AM PDT by
George W. Bush
(Rudi & McVain: tough on terror, scared of Iowa)
To: stevie_d_64
That’s why I said “ON THIS, I’ll back Paul 100%.” I don’t back him on his foreign policy, I think it’s somewhere between naive and suicidal. I do agree with him on repealing the anchor baby provisions.
}:-)4
215 posted on
06/11/2007 9:13:02 AM PDT by
Moose4
(Just junk all across the horizon, a real highwayman's farewell...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson