Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freespirited

Yay! And for a reward we will get to return to the status quo of open borders! US citizens lose in both cases! Don’t you just love it when you get the lesser of two evils?


85 posted on 06/07/2007 6:15:49 PM PDT by burzum (None shall see me, though my battlecry may give me away -Minsc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: burzum
so you’re willing to settle for only a 25% reduction in the flow of illegals across our borders and the inevitable next amnesty as a result?
150 posted on 06/07/2007 6:25:05 PM PDT by SCHROLL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

To: burzum
Yay! And for a reward we will get to return to the status quo of open borders! US citizens lose in both cases! Don’t you just love it when you get the lesser of two evils?

Not quite true. This bill focused a sleeping public on an issue they have not cared about for about 40 years. From this point on, every R candidate ought to be talking about securing the border. The R's ought to be introducing bills weekly to secure the border. And we need to run in 2008 on securing the border. Every democrat must be forced to take a position that will alienate their base or will do the right thing.

Up 'til now, this has been a wedge issue against the R's. Now, if we focus the issue on secure borders, it's a wedge issue against the D's.

If this bill had passed, the public would have gone back to sleep and the borders would have stayed porous. Now we have a chance to actually do something about it.

163 posted on 06/07/2007 6:28:14 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson