Posted on 06/07/2007 11:16:02 AM PDT by Hal1950
Look it up yourself. You were there, [when are you not?] - and so was Rokke if memory serves. - Ask him.
You never prove your own allegations - because you can’t.
Not hard to do when you're sociopathic. They can kill a close friend without batting an eye if it serves to benefit them. No conscience...and very dangerous.
Someone else here on FR remembered hearing about Gore's aide...yet it's been a while since this was discussed...so I don't remember who confirmed he'd seen the news clip at the time. I'm not a conspiracy buff....but the Clintons give you way too much fodder to work with.
You never prove your own allegations - because you can't.
You flat out deny that I posted the above specifics on another thread?
Put up or shut up.
You see tens of thousands of them don't you, including the ten expert metalurgists who found no evidence of a missile shootdown, contrary to your fantasies.
By some hypothesized short circuit between some frayed fuel sensor wiring and high voltage wiring in some conduit never shown. And no corrective ECN to Boeing. And evidence the many failed attempts to detonate residual jet fuel in a tank by any means.
The CIA's fabrication of the zoom-climb nonsense to explain many credible eye-witnesses accounts points to government cover-up. An airplane is quite unstable with its nose missing - no aerodynamic lift, inertia, drag and gravity would control its trajectory - inertia is forward, drag is backward, gravity is downward. No thrust from the engines because their control has been ripped away - 0.
The many eye-witnesses were suppressed, not allowed to testify to Congress. Mike Wire's second interview account was fabricated by the FBI. I wonder how many others were altered, so as to introduce confusion into the "investigation"?
TWA 800 was shot down by missiles, otherwise why did the FBI remove parts of TWA 800 in the middle of the night? This came out in a Senate hearing.
And why did the bodies of the people closest to the fuel tank have no leg injuries from the “exploding fuel tank”?
Also the machinists union says that a high pressure event breached the fuselage which led to the destruction of the aircraft, i.e. it was a missile. They could find no source of spark, same as Boeing.
There are photos of the missile and radar images on the internet at
http://www.wrhradio.com/RANCHO/CRASH/TWA/PHOTOS.html and at
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/CRASH/TWA/RADAR/radar.html
There was video of the missile, NBC won the bidding war for the footage but it was seized by 3 men before it was aired.
Thank you for your Excellent posts. You are right on target.
It's statements like this that chill my spine.
The terrorists achieved much of their objectives on 9-11.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.