Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy

Reagan open the door to abortion, whether it was limited or not it is still killing an unborn baby. That didn’t make him a pro abort and I never said that. A pro abort is unapologetic for most all abortions. Reagan was sorry he open that evil door. What I said is true, he legalized abortion. To be more accurate I should have said limited, that is true. But for the health of the mother is not very limited and he should have known that. You are just not accurate in calling me a liar. Anyways, I forgive Reagan for that because he was a man who wasn’t perfect like all of us and admitted to his mistake. And I can see that same sincerity in Romney’s admission to being wrong. His heart changed on it well before he started his run for president. I think you are being very uncharitable and judgemental towards him.
And your method of debate by calling my points which were true, although should have been more accurate, steaming dodo, is pretty low. Don’t know how you wish to convince people of your points by insulting them. And then mincing words to try and uphold your assertions.


56 posted on 06/08/2007 10:16:37 AM PDT by fabian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: fabian
And your method of debate by calling my points which were true, although should have been more accurate, steaming dodo, is pretty low

Wrong. I called you on your omissions. You are trying to draw moral equivalence between Reagan and Romney with such, and that is a crock. Reagan signed a very limited abortion bill that subsequently was abused. I posted Romney's explicityly pro-Roe quotes from 1994. THERE IS UTTERLY NO MORAL EQUIVALENCE BETWEEN THE TWO.

Heck, Mitt was pro-Roe in the 2002 election as well. But now he's pro-life? And we are supposed to disregard the fact that his conversion coincides with his drive for a new office?

Been there, done that, won't get fooled again. Your sense of false indignation is only trumped by your lack of any sense of shame for attempting this worn-out gambit that good conservative freepers have shot down repeatedly over the last few months.

57 posted on 06/08/2007 10:26:27 AM PDT by dirtboy (A store clerk has done more to fight the WOT than Rudy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: fabian
That didn’t make him a pro abort and I never said that. That didn’t make him a pro abort and I never said that. A pro abort is unapologetic for most all abortions.

Wrong. A pro-abort enables abortion on demand. They always have that dodge of "Well, I'm personally against abortion, BUT..." However, their support of Roe and abortion "rights" is what makes legal abortion on demand possible.

Reagan did NOT sign a bill that allowed for abortion on demand. But you said Reagan favored legalized abortion (which was a lie by omission). Mitt, however, praised Roe and said it should be defended - and Roe enabled abortion on demand. Ergo, Mitt was pro-abort, despite his "BUT..." routine.

58 posted on 06/08/2007 10:32:50 AM PDT by dirtboy (A store clerk has done more to fight the WOT than Rudy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson