so Reagan didn’t actually sign the abortion law in California? That was being for legal abortion...health of the mother is opening pandoras box of evil and he realized how bad of a law it was. So where did I lie? Reagan was for limited abortion legalization. I never said he was a pro abortion person. Can you please be a bit more rational in your debate? And why can’t you give Romney the same charity and belief in his word that he sees legal abortion as being evil?
so Reagan didn’t actually sign the abortion law in California? That was being for legal abortion...health of the mother is opening pandoras box of evil and he realized how bad of a law it was.
After it was abused. Reagan did NOT sign a law legalizing abortion on demand.
So where did I lie? Reagan was for limited abortion legalization.
The lie is right there in your sentence. All of as sudden, you start using the word "limited". The word you omitted before. And, as Orwell once noted, omission is the most powerful form of lie.
I never said he was a pro abortion person.
You said this:
Reagan was for legalized abortion too until his heart changed
So you did claim he was pro-abort.
Can you please be a bit more rational in your debate?
Can you quit lying by omission?
And why can’t you give Romney the same charity and belief in his word that he sees legal abortion as being evil?
Sorry, but that does not jibe with him trying to run to the left of Ted Kennedy on abortion in 1994, and running as pro-choice in 2002. Quite frankly, Mitt is now running for the GOP nomination and needs to be pro-life. In his last two elections, he was pro-choice (and pushing being pro-abort) when it suited that election. So he is completely unconvincing now, given that history.