Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hschliemann

I’m just curious, what compels you to oppose the 19th. Is it that you consider women not mature enough to vote, or too emotional to vote, or not smart enough, or what? And yes, I do realize that had only women voted for President in 2000, Al Gore would have won solidly.


97 posted on 10/27/2007 5:28:20 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Repeal the Terrible Two - the 16th and 17th Amendments. Sink LOST! Stop SPP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
I’m just curious, what compels you to oppose the 19th. Is it that you consider women not mature enough to vote, or too emotional to vote, or not smart enough, or what?

Patterns of women's voting are different from those of men. Women for whatever reasons seem far more inclined to vote for candidates who would use the Constitution as toilet paper. While I don't know that forbidding women from voting would be the proper solution to this, the voting patterns would seem to be a basis for concern.

BTW, I think a major key to restoring the republic would be for the Supreme Court to acknowledge that states are only required to have one legislative body elected proportionally by the population, and that in bicameral legislatures it is entirely proper to have one body elected via some other means. Clearly the Founding Fathers would have considered such a split appropriate.

105 posted on 10/27/2007 6:43:20 PM PDT by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson