Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Think Political Parties Are Destroying America? Thank the 17th Amendment! by Todd Huston
The New Media Journal ^ | 5 june 2007 | Todd Huston

Posted on 06/05/2007 10:55:19 AM PDT by K-oneTexas

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 last
To: sand88

Which leads me to my last reply in resurrecting this thread:

My idea for improving voting patterns would be to repeal the 26th Amendment, which allowed people under 21 to vote, and then restrict the franchise to U.S. Citizens who are homeowners, business owners, and military veterans. Women pay taxes; they should be allowed to keep the franchise, subject to the aforementioned restrictions.

My franchise restrictions would also require repeal of that section of the 14th Amendment which withholds some House representation from states denying all men (nowadays, people) the franchise.


101 posted on 10/27/2007 5:54:01 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Repeal the Terrible Two - the 16th and 17th Amendments. Sink LOST! Stop SPP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; sand88
and then restrict the franchise to U.S. Citizens who are homeowners, business owners, OR military veterans. d-oh!
102 posted on 10/27/2007 6:01:30 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Repeal the Terrible Two - the 16th and 17th Amendments. Sink LOST! Stop SPP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
If it weren't for Reynolds v. Sims, which forced ALL houses of all state legislatures to bow to the false god of proportional representation, we'd have a better chance of a GOP majority, as state Senates would be able to use other methods of representation, such as county-by-county.

That one still boggles my mind, since the Founding Fathers clearly not only believed that proportional representation in all legislative bodies was not essential to a republic, but in fact explicitly set up a republic with a non-proportional legislative body.

103 posted on 10/27/2007 6:36:49 PM PDT by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: supercat

Judicial fiat: 5 out of 9, law of the land. Kinda cool. /s


104 posted on 10/27/2007 6:42:41 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Repeal the Terrible Two - the 16th and 17th Amendments. Sink LOST! Stop SPP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
I’m just curious, what compels you to oppose the 19th. Is it that you consider women not mature enough to vote, or too emotional to vote, or not smart enough, or what?

Patterns of women's voting are different from those of men. Women for whatever reasons seem far more inclined to vote for candidates who would use the Constitution as toilet paper. While I don't know that forbidding women from voting would be the proper solution to this, the voting patterns would seem to be a basis for concern.

BTW, I think a major key to restoring the republic would be for the Supreme Court to acknowledge that states are only required to have one legislative body elected proportionally by the population, and that in bicameral legislatures it is entirely proper to have one body elected via some other means. Clearly the Founding Fathers would have considered such a split appropriate.

105 posted on 10/27/2007 6:43:20 PM PDT by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Yep, ratifying the 17th Amendment, worst thing that ever has been done to our country. With one Amendment, states rights were abolished, Governors had little or no say in national affairs and mandates, and permanent Senate fiefdoms established by the ruling elites. The balance was totally wiped out, states lost their sovereignty and became pass through handmaidens of the federal government.

Repeal is the only answer.


106 posted on 10/27/2007 6:48:21 PM PDT by Tarpon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fix; K-oneTexas

An easy remedy would be to pass a law that would allow the state legislatures to approve the ballot for US Senator in their state. In other words, many candidates could compete for their state’s popular vote only after they were cleared by their state legislature.

No US Senator would dare vote against such a law.


107 posted on 10/27/2007 6:54:50 PM PDT by Hostage (Fred Thompson will be President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317

Debs was in prison when he got those 400k votes it should be pointed out.


108 posted on 10/27/2007 8:31:05 PM PDT by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sand88

Article V says the state Legislatures can propose an amendment: “The Congress, whenever 2/3rds of the both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendment....”


109 posted on 10/29/2007 12:05:10 PM PDT by Ellar (Ellar7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
I think you might have been able to make that case prior to Reynolds v. Sims, which forced all chambers of the state legislatures to represent people proportionally (one man = one vote).

You are correct, the disproportion of representation was a *lot* greater before Reynolds. Now, it's just the result of Gerrymandering. And that can *still* make a lot of difference. (Just ask congressional Democrats in Texas, who recently had their heads handed to them on a redistricting map).

110 posted on 10/29/2007 4:57:18 PM PDT by M. Dodge Thomas (Opinion based on research by an eyewear firm, which surveyed 100 members of a speed dating club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson