Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah
How about that one? Seems to me the Executive and the Judiciary are NOT authorized to punish a Congresscritter for disorderly behavior.

Simply states that the House and Senate may punish their members. Does NOT state that the judiciary cannot.

139 posted on 06/04/2007 2:55:51 PM PDT by NeonKnight (We don't believe you, you need more people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]


To: NeonKnight
Says Congress can do it. It doesn't say anywhere else in the Constitution that a member ~ get that word "member" ~ that's why they have to kick them out first ~ may be punished by any other party.

This clause PREEMPTS the Executive and Judiciary. Now, concerning Commander in Chief, maybe not, particularly if the member is a rebel or something. Presumably even a militia member could shoot one.

Lots and lots of these more obscure Constitutional clauses were exercised (and with that much better understood) as the Confederates left the Congress way back when.

Good to read about what Congress did then.

140 posted on 06/04/2007 2:59:58 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

To: NeonKnight
One last thing ~ should answer all your questions ~ the primary organization principle behind our federal system is that the national government (which is usually referred to as the federal government) may do only those things for which it is authorized in the Constitution.

The Congress is authorized to "punish members". It is un-necessary to further elaborate on that.

Now, get back to that ground glass, and don't grind it too fine. We want some real blood here.

141 posted on 06/04/2007 3:06:26 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson