I mean it sincerely when I say that I would have a hard time not socking someone in the diaphragm if I heard that crap. I hope you shredded them in full public view with the truth. At least I hope you at least guffawed or called bullshit on them.
For the first guy, I was laughing hysterically. Some others in his crowd basically gave me a thumbs up. Later, I had a chance to talk to him and he had no idea how the shooting occured. He was just mouthing nonsense to the tourist rubes for tips.
The second guy? I was on my way out and yelled out a disgusted “Jesus Christ” and kept walking. What an idiot.
I wonder how Vince deals with the facts that using the Warren Report itself, and the Z film:
- We can throw out the 1st shot at an [early] frame in the 160's, as JFK disappeared [to Oswald] in the foliage at frame 166. - Unless it missed, which is contradicted by most all other evidence.
At frame 166, - Oswald would have had to be standing, - or seated leaning far out of the window, - in order to achieve the steep downward angle to his target, - which was also moving away down the street to the right.
Tough shot, which he probably did not take.
We are then left with this sequence:
First shot at frame 210, - 'neck' hit.
Cycle bolt [2.3 seconds] aim, fire, miss. [curb hit?]
Cycle bolt [2.3 seconds] aim, fire, head shot [frame 313].
The shot at frame 210 is still at a fairly steep down angle, with the limo going to Oswalds right, making it even more difficult to line up the single bullet with JFK's wounds - and Connelly's wounds.
Thus, the 3rd shot is the 'easy one' from Oswalds position, with the down angle decreased and the limo going fairly straight away.
All told, the sequence of shots that Specter dreamed up has major flaws. - And has never been duplicated convincingly .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57mVVTtfk6U
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HNmqJO4dFDE&mode=related&search=