[Cicero]

No, sorry. I would agree, normally, that the perfect is the enemy of the good. But Rudy would not be good.

Less harm would be done allowing Hildabeast to be elected than electing a pro-abortionist on the Republican ticket, giving us two pro-abortion, pro-fetal experimentation, pro-gun-grabbing, pro-assisted-suicide, pro-gay/lesbian parties. That simply cannot be allowed to happen.

It would destroy the party and the conservative coalition.

Now, I don’t wan’t hillary in the White House, which means that I don’t want Rudy nominated. Cut him off before that happens, or it will end in total disaster.

[jonathanmo]

So when Hillary appoints Ruth Bader Ginberg’s three socialist sisters during the next 8 years, how does that help your cause?

[presently no screen name]

Less harm would be done allowing Hildabeast to be elected than electing a pro-abortionist......

That is the dumbest statement that has been trotted over this forum - unless one is truly ignorant of her. It's a feel good statement - 'my way or forget it'.

[upsdriver]

That is a perfect explaination!