Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TommyDale
First of all, when Fred Thompson officially enters (He is filing to form an exploratory committee on June 1, this Friday) all your arguments are moot. Giuliani will NOT be the nominee, and a need for a third party will be unnecessary.

I've noted that before. And he'll clearly draw from Giuliani voters. Which is an excellent reason not to proudly drive voters away. That only tends to reinforce their convictions.

If for some strange unforeseen circumstance Fred Thompson does not stop Giuliani, a new third party might just emerge ala Perot to stop the GOP abortionist. If that means turning the country over to the Dems, that is the fault of the GOP, isn’t it? I seriously doubt that will happen post primaries. If Hillary wins, it will be because she got more votes. That's not necessarily the GOPs fault, people may simply feel she's better on the issues. People who recognize a difference will vote, other's may see no difference and not vote. That decision is on them, not the GOP. In the undesired event that it's Hillary vs Giuliani, there will be a recognizable difference between the parties.

147 posted on 05/30/2007 1:59:20 PM PDT by SJackson (Be careful -- with quotations, you can damn anything, Andre Malraux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]


To: SJackson; Liz; indylindy; calcowgirl
"In the undesired event that it's Hillary vs Giuliani, there will be a recognizable difference between the parties."

That is quite arguable.

150 posted on 05/30/2007 2:01:45 PM PDT by TommyDale (More Americans are killed each day in the U.S. by abortion than were killed on 9/11 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson