Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Diogenesis
Romney did what Hillary could not, so maybe he should be her VP.

How are their two plans similar?

Be specific.

I already know the answer. They're not the least bit similar. Hillarycare is pure socialism. Mitt's plan was market-based, an implementation of a plan formulated and advanced by the Heritage Foundation--the nation's premier conservative think-tank. Granted, once the Mass Democrat legislature got a hold of it, it changed. But what Mitt proposed was market-based, pure and simple.

But let's hear you spin a fantasy.

87 posted on 05/29/2007 4:07:12 PM PDT by JCEccles (“Politics ain’t beanbag” Finley Peter Dunne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: JCEccles

HillaryCARE Socialism = RomneyCARE Socialism
because BOTH remove free choice from the individual.

The problem was several hundred thousand illegal aliens
clogging up emergency rooms at all the hospitals,
driving medical rates up.

Romney FAILED to remove illegal aliens, only
speaking up 4 weeks before he left office.

Instead, he pushed his socialized medicine
(as Hillary could not)
down the throats of EVERYONE in Massachusetts
except the illegal aliens (that caused the problem
to begin with).

Romney created socialized medicine in the US and NOT CHOICE.

Now if you dare to explain CLEARLY the difference
between Hillary and Romneys socialism removing choice
from the individual, then have a go.


90 posted on 05/29/2007 6:20:05 PM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson