RomneyCARE, socialized medicine by dictat,
does not give people choice.
Romney is only pro-free market when it is for HIM.
For others, Romney is a socialist who took choice
from people in Mass on health care and gay marriage.
[I know you will blame it on others, but he was the Gov.].
You again refuse to deal with facts. Would you call mandatory car insurance a socialist program ? If yes, then you need common sense 101.
If no, then let’s agree that people need some form of health insurance so that the tax payers are not left footing the bill. Romney CARE does not control what plan you have and you have the same level of choice of doctor’s you have today. That is not even close to Hillary CARE.
I strongly disagree with health benefits for illegals but that is a federal law which I would support repealing. It does illustrate what happens when a large % of people do not have health insurance. At least we can ensure that law abiding citizens are self responsible by not askikng me to pick up their health care tab.
This is a very conservative and self reliant stance, not socialist at all. If you actually read his plan with an open mind you would agree as well.
What would you suggest as a solution, why should I pay the cost for someone that buys a plasma TV instead of health insurance for him and his family. I think it is socialist to take money from me to pay health care costs for an irresponsible bum.