No, it’s not literally the same, but the sentiment and reprocity are the same. Yet it arose from an entirely separate tradition from the Christian one. My point is that supernatural fundaments are not necessary to arrive at morality.
But there is a very significant differance. "Do" is the opposite of "do not".
My point is that supernatural fundaments are not necessary to arrive at morality.
I'm no expert on Confucius. Some quick checks on the web seem to show him to be a wise an decent fellow.
And I think he might disagree with you:
Confucius said: A virtuous man has three awes:
1- Awe for Heaven’s decree,
2- Awe for great men.
3- Awe for saints’ words... When worshipping God, one must feel as if He were visibly present.
All you can offer to define it is an estoric hobgoblin.
Morality and all of its associated ideals are rooted entirely in the presupposition some higher power defines what is correct for human behavior.