Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scrutinize Amnesty International
The New York Sun ^ | May 23, 2007 | Gerald Steinbert

Posted on 05/26/2007 1:50:50 PM PDT by DaveCooper

For many journalists, diplomats, and political activists, Amnesty International is considered to be a highly reliable and objective source of information and analysis on human rights around the world. But the halo that surrounds its reports and campaigns is beginning to fray, as the evidence of political bias and inaccuracy mounts.

Recently, The Economist, published in Britain, noted that “an organisation which devotes more pages in its annual report to human-rights abuses in Britain and America than those in Belarus and Saudi Arabia cannot expect to escape doubters’ scrutiny.” Other critics, including law professor at Harvard, Alan Dershowitz, and the U.S.-based Capital Research Center, have been more pointed, providing evidence of Amnesty’s systematic bias and reports based largely on claims by carefully selected “eyewitnesses” in Colombia, Gaza, and Lebanon.

As Amnesty releases its annual report on human rights for 2006, amid highly choreographed public relations events, and repeating the familiar condemnations of Israel and America, NGO Monitor has also published a report on Amnesty’s activities in the Middle East. The result is not a pretty picture for those clinging to the “halo effect.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nysun.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hypocrites; leftists
I was once a member of that organization; but even I, dense as I am, came to realize that it had gone seriously astray.
1 posted on 05/26/2007 1:50:50 PM PDT by DaveCooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DaveCooper

I was a member also but that was a long time ago when they actually were concerned with Soviet political prisoners in the Gulag.


2 posted on 05/26/2007 2:26:30 PM PDT by midway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveCooper

I recntly discovered that a gal I dated about 10 years ago is now head of the Philadelphia branch of AI. I looked at her articles and they’re all just the same old Dem talking points, not one iota of original thinking. All the usual catchphrases are there: Bush’s failed war, Bush’s illegal war, culture of corruption, tirture, blah, blah, blah. Sickening.


3 posted on 05/26/2007 2:32:12 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveCooper

I was a member too more than 20 years ago.

Needless to say I didn’t last long...


4 posted on 05/26/2007 2:41:55 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveCooper

What? An organization of Communist Elitists is being scrutinized for “bias”?

I smell a plot by Jewish bankers and Bushco....

(/sarcasm)


5 posted on 05/26/2007 2:57:09 PM PDT by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson