To: Coyoteman; fortheDeclaration
Forget the bones, forget the fossils. Mitochondrial DNA doesn’t support 5,000 year old humans. Simply no case for it. Unless of course the rules of DNA shifted magically - probably not.
86 posted on
05/27/2007 11:19:40 AM PDT by
mad_as_he$$
(Never insult small minded men in positions of power.)
To: mad_as_he$$
Mitochondrial DNA doesnt support 5,000 year old humans. Correct. There is a good case from southern Alaska with an individual dated at 10,300 years. The fun part is that individual's mtDNA is found in living individuals stretching on the west coasts of both North and South America.
This also argues against the idea of a global flood, as there is no trace of Noah type mtDNA in the New World.
87 posted on
05/27/2007 11:31:40 AM PDT by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: mad_as_he$$
Forget the bones, forget the fossils. Mitochondrial DNA doesnt support 5,000 year old humans. Simply no case for it. Unless of course the rules of DNA shifted magically - probably not. Another unproven assertion.
And how did this complex DNA to be from simple, one celled creatures?(never mind where they came from, life from non-life,the evolutionist claims that he is not required to answer that)
Oh, says the evolutionist, we can't explain that, but we know that it did.
Save it for the Great White Throne Judgement (Rev.20), it will be interesting to see how it plays before your Creator.
But God, the scientists said you didn't exist....
95 posted on
05/29/2007 5:22:21 AM PDT by
fortheDeclaration
(We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! -Abe Lincoln)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson