Replies

You want to talk about the frauds and liars in the evolution movement? I asked for evidence, not more empty evolutinist rhetoric.

I was pointing out that he sounded about as ridiculous as those that claim Adam was off riding dinosaurs. I'm not doubting God's hand in things. But I don't see the importance of limiting His actions to a specific timescale that can be found nowhere in the Bible.

Moreover, it is not a necessity that the Universe to be only 6,000 years old for the Creation account to be correct.

Ah but it can't be over 10,000 years old can it? 6,000, 10,000, 50,000,000. Does it really matter that much to you? Why?

You want to talk about the frauds and liars in the evolution movement? I asked for evidence, not more empty evolutinist rhetoric. I was pointing out that he sounded about as ridiculous as those that claim Adam was off riding dinosaurs. I'm not doubting God's hand in things. But I don't see the importance of limiting His actions to a specific timescale that can be found nowhere in the Bible.

Never heard of anyone riding any dinosaurs.

But very likely they existed with man.

We are now finding all kind of species that we did not know even existed, so who is to say what existed with man before the flood.

Moreover, it is not a necessity that the Universe to be only 6,000 years old for the Creation account to be correct. Ah but it can't be over 10,000 years old can it? 6,000, 10,000, 50,000,000. Does it really matter that much to you? Why?

Frankly the age of the Universe is not as important to me as is the age of man and the method of creation, direct and immediate.

Adam was a real man, the Fall was real, and the need for a saviour is real.

No Adam, no Fall, no need for a Second Adam, the Lord Jesus Christ, since, according to evolution, man is not made in the image of God, he is just an highly evolved animal.

evolution, general theory n. the notion of a continuous naturalistic, mechanistic process by which all living things have arisen from a single living source, which itself arose by a similar process from a non-living, inanimate world, which in turn came into being and developed from nothing (i.e., spontaneous generation).

Now this is what evolutionists don't want anyone to see, what is behind the curtain, what their theory really states.

And that is suppose to be 'rational'!!!