To: fortheDeclaration
You have to show that the dating is indeed accurate. False. You are challenging mainstream science with a fringe idea. You have to show that your fringe idea has more merit than mainstream science.
That's the way it works in science. Fringe ideas stay on the fringe until they can bring some evidence to the discussion.
Where is your evidence?
I'll check back later. Right now I have more important things to do. I haven't dusted my dental floss collection in weeks.
115 posted on
05/29/2007 8:49:58 AM PDT by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: Coyoteman
You have to show that the dating is indeed accurate. False. You are challenging mainstream science with a fringe idea. You have to show that your fringe idea has more merit than mainstream science. That's the way it works in science. Fringe ideas stay on the fringe until they can bring some evidence to the discussion. Where is your evidence? I'll check back later. Right now I have more important things to do. I haven't dusted my dental floss collection in weeks. You asked for evidence against your dating.
You got it.
Deal with the evidence.
Just saying it is 'fringe' is a copout and you know it.
Your 'science' if dating is suspect and you well know it.
You have no dating that dates conclusively with over 10,000 years.
117 posted on
05/29/2007 8:57:33 AM PDT by
fortheDeclaration
(We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! -Abe Lincoln)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson