Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
“... the U.S. tariff couldn’t have had much effect on their imports, if it had any effect at all.”

U.S. tariffs on finished imported goods, beginning in 1816, were designed to protect emerging manufacturing firms, located principally in the Northeast, from foreign (primarily English) competition. As these tariffs especially affected (indirectly, as explained previously) the market for raw cotton, South Carolina politicians fought these tariffs relentlessly, leading to the so-called nullification crisis of 1832. Henry Clay, aka The Great Compromiser, led the way to passage of legislation in 1833 which specified the gradual lowering of tariffs to the level existing in 1816.

The tariffs were a huge deal to politicians in both the North and the South, and almost led to South Carolina’s secession in 1832. They must have had, or at the time were perceived to have had, large effects and gave rise to the first militarily relevant sectional conflicts in the U.S.

331 posted on 05/24/2007 9:06:56 AM PDT by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies ]


To: riverdawg

And who controlled the Presidency and the Congress during the 1832 crisis? Southern Democrats.


354 posted on 05/24/2007 9:38:43 AM PDT by LexBaird (PR releases are the Chinese dog food of political square meals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson