The basic facts of the attempted muder case are fairly clear. Six black guys jumped one white guy while at school. They knocked him unconscious and then kicked him as he lay defenseless, sending him to the hospital. The assailants are facing attempted murder charges for these acts. I based my observations on these facts, not as you claim on "nothing but speculation".
Now would be a good time for you to pause and ask yourself whether you are being a complete and utter retard and if so, why.
Interesting that you've suddenly shifted gears and are now claiming to speak only about the latest incident in a long chain of events. I'm sure that this shift is entirely coincidental, and has nothing whatsoever to do with your hypocrisy being pointed out for all to see.
So let's review. The article tells of six "incidents": nooses hung on a tree, a series of fights, an arson fire, a white youth beating up a black student, a white man pulling a shotgun on three black students, six black students beating a white student, and a white student bringing a rifle to school.
You've run all over this thread telling people they cannot jump to conclusions because the writer is biased. That may very well be true. Yet you then proceed to seize on one of the six incidents and determine that the entire issue is about "black thuggery".
I initially said it looked to be hypocrisy. After further examination I'll admit that it may also just be very poor logic on your part. Either way, it doesn't reflect well on you.
Now would be a good time for you to pause and ask yourself whether you are being a complete and utter retard and if so, why.
*shrug*
And while I'm doing that, I'd strongly suggest you consider whether acting the part of a pompous and arrogant windbag (and thus revealing a basic character defect) is your best course of action.