Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/23/2007 4:56:14 AM PDT by Condor 63
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Condor 63

Congratulations to Armstrong.

It’s not often that you see a 77-year-old described as “doable” in the newspaper.


2 posted on 05/23/2007 5:01:39 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Condor 63

I don’t really think it’s doable under the present circumstances.


3 posted on 05/23/2007 5:07:16 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Condor 63

“He said helium 3 is needed to fuel fusion reactors for nuclear plants.”

Except that we don’t have any fusion reactors.


4 posted on 05/23/2007 5:09:29 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Condor 63

I think it’s doable too, but have an idea that would, in my opinion, greatly increase the chances for a successful mission to Mars. Make it a one-way trip. That way, all the resources of the spacecraft would be geared towards getting there and setting up a colony, rather than storing fuel and supplies for a return trip to earth. I realize that some might have moral questions about such a mission, but I am sure there would be explorers willing to do this.


7 posted on 05/23/2007 5:18:58 AM PDT by IndyTiger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Condor 63

We will remain on this planet until the US withdraws from the Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, Including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies of 1967


8 posted on 05/23/2007 5:19:45 AM PDT by frithguild (The Freepers moved as a group, like a school of sharks sweeping toward an unaware and unarmed victim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Condor 63

He’s wrong. If it were pre-Nixon, i.e., pre-Affirmative Action, it would be difficult and expensive, but doable. Now it’s impossible in the public sector.


12 posted on 05/23/2007 5:44:49 AM PDT by jammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Condor 63
Yeah, it could be done, though a few minutes' thought will show that it would be a huge undertaking.

But the real question is, why should it be done? What is there about Mars that would justify the immense cost of sending a few people to visit? I honestly cannot think of one.

The more rational and sustainable approach would be to ignore Mars altogether, and focus on building space infrastructure closer to home. Once that's in place, Mars will be a natural and relatively easy goal.

Otherwise, it's just another Apollo program, but with a duration that makes it far too long to be an "event". It would never survive the politics.

18 posted on 05/23/2007 6:42:21 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Condor 63

Wow. I thought Armstrong never made public appearances anymore?


20 posted on 05/23/2007 6:44:10 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Condor 63

Wasn’t he with Crosby, Stills, & Nash...???


35 posted on 05/23/2007 7:35:31 AM PDT by JB in Whitefish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tricky_k_1972; KevinDavis
Ping!
41 posted on 05/25/2007 6:42:29 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Time heals all wounds, particularly when they're not yours. Profile updated May 22, 2007.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson