To: true_blue_texican
Not only am I thinking for myself, I’m speaking from proven historical fact.
That’s silly.
Unless you are suggesting that vote fraud is taking place, a vote for candidate “c” will NOT be counted toward either candidate “a” or “b”
100 posted on
05/22/2007 10:55:24 AM PDT by
WhiteGuy
(GOP Congress - 16,000 earmarks costing US $50 billion in 2006 - PAUL2008)
To: WhiteGuy
Not only am I thinking for myself, I’m speaking from proven historical fact. That’s silly
No, it is not silly. Bill Clinton was elected because Ross Perot received so many "3rd party" votes. Simple fact of history.
107 posted on
05/22/2007 11:00:44 AM PDT by
true_blue_texican
(...against all enemies, foreign and domestic...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson