In a November 2005 interview with the Globe, Romney described immigration proposals by McCain and others as quite different from amnesty, because they required illegal immigrants to register with the government, work for years, pay taxes, not take public benefits, and pay a fine before applying for citizenship.
Thats very different than amnesty, where you literally say, OK, everybody here gets to stay, Romney said in the interview. Its saying you could work your way into becoming a legal resident of the country by working here without taking benefits and then applying and then paying a fine.
Romney did not specifically endorse McCains bill, saying he had not yet formulated a full position on immigration. But he did speak approvingly of efforts by McCain and Bush to solve the nations immigration crisis, calling them reasonable proposals.
Romney also said in the interview that it was not practical or economic for the country to deport the estimated 12 million immigrants living in the US illegally.
Eternal Vigilance
I get more e-mails over you, just because I like Romney. What are you a one man army against Romney? Anyway, I prefer not to get e-mails one way or the other over what Eternal Vigilance does or does not do in Free Republic. I don’t mean they come from Eternal Vigilance, I mean they come from others, and well I tire of them.
I respectfully agree, to disagree or agree with Eternal Vigilance.
You know , Eternal Vigilance, Romney is moving ahead in the polls, and the others are falling behind. Fred hasn’t put his hat into the race. :-) You must be doing something wrong.