Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Carry_Okie
The techniques and materials to build a ship like that correctly have been lost to history and stupidity. This is a tragic loss of an irreplaceable artifact.

I was in Baltimore a few years back, and was passing by the Pride of Baltimore (III?) while she was fitting out. She was beamy and stable, but not at all like the previous vessels. Of course, she probably will not capsize and sink, either.

Nobody would be crazy enough to put that much sail on a vessel so narrow anymore. There are better ways to get someplace fast. She was just too unsafe for modern standards. But it is the massive sail area over the narrow hull that made the ship so beautiful and conveyed the purpose of all-out crazy speed.

If a modern vessel were built to replace the Cutty Sark, it would just break your heart to see it.

72 posted on 05/21/2007 3:23:30 AM PDT by gridlock (On January 20, 2009, Fred Dalton Thompson will be sworn in as President of the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: gridlock
If a modern vessel were built to replace the Cutty Sark, it would just break your heart to see it.

No doubt. It's the timber preparation (seasoning) even before milling and the processes by which they were bent, shaped, and planked that are no more in a size that big, particularly for the reverse curves. I just love locust treenails, deadeyes and lanyards, Matthew Walker knots, and the smell of pitch. What can I say?

If the Cutty Sark is gone, perhaps now they'll restore the Vicar of Bray. Hopefully they got to the Cutty in time.

86 posted on 05/21/2007 6:23:15 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (Duncan Hunter for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson