Skip to comments.
(Vanity) The Amnesty Act of 2007 (Discussion of Text from the Bill)
Thomas (Library of Congress) ^
| 5-20-2007
| grey_whiskers
Posted on 05/20/2007 12:37:52 PM PDT by grey_whiskers
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
This is Amnesty, folks, no ifs, ands, or buts.
Bush Swallows.
To: grey_whiskers
Yes it is.
A far better “plan” would be to finish Duncan Hunter’s border fence, and enforce the damn laws we have now.
2
posted on
05/20/2007 12:39:55 PM PDT
by
pissant
To: grey_whiskers
3
posted on
05/20/2007 12:41:17 PM PDT
by
tomakaze
(Cuius testiculos habes, habeas cardia et cerebellum.)
To: pissant
Whatever happened with the law that “ no profit can be made from criminal activity”?
Corporations clearly profit from hiring illegals.
4
posted on
05/20/2007 12:42:47 PM PDT
by
LFOD777
(In 2006, Washington spent $2.7 Trillion and ran a $248 billion budget deficit.)
To: grey_whiskers
5
posted on
05/20/2007 12:43:35 PM PDT
by
LFOD777
(In 2006, Washington spent $2.7 Trillion and ran a $248 billion budget deficit.)
To: grey_whiskers
“Get that? They are empowered to do something (anyone want to look up Section 101(a) (43) (F) (8 U.S.C. 1101(a) (43)(F) after a
THIRD DRUNK DRIVING CONVICTION WHICH OCCURS AFTER THIS BILL!!!!!!
Ted Kennedy must have insisted on this personally ;-)
Americans die on the first DUI!
6
posted on
05/20/2007 12:44:08 PM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
To: grey_whiskers
From just about everything I've read and heard over the past few days, I think this bill is either DOA or will be severely altered as it moves through the process. I'm guessing even our clueless, thick-headed solons have gotten the point that nobody likes this one.
7
posted on
05/20/2007 12:44:33 PM PDT
by
JennysCool
("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." -Mencken)
To: grey_whiskers
Thanks for this. Bookmarking.
8
posted on
05/20/2007 12:45:22 PM PDT
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: LFOD777
It remains unenforced just like the law that says you cannot be here illegally.
9
posted on
05/20/2007 12:45:23 PM PDT
by
pissant
To: grey_whiskers
“I dont know what this meansbut WTF arent they concerned with protecting citizens from illegal aliens who are sex offenders?
Oh, and Sanctuary Cities are A-OK:”
Unbelievable!! They ARE the offenders!!
10
posted on
05/20/2007 12:46:00 PM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
To: LFOD777; Admin Moderator
11
posted on
05/20/2007 12:46:03 PM PDT
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: grey_whiskers
“Oh, and section 7 says it out loud.
EMPLOYERS CANNOT USE THE VERIFICATION SYSTEM FOR SCREENING PRIOR TO AN OFFER OF EMPLOYEMENT.
EMPLOYERS CANNOT FIRE ANYONE ON THE BASIS OF A TENTATIVE NONCONFIRMATION.
EMPLOYERS CANNOT USE THE VERIFICATION SYSTEM (except as described in a completely different document) AFTER THREE DAYS EMPLOYMENT”
Useless!!
12
posted on
05/20/2007 12:48:44 PM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
To: grey_whiskers
keep it here, your observations need to stay up front rather than buried pages in in another thread.
13
posted on
05/20/2007 12:48:47 PM PDT
by
tomakaze
(Cuius testiculos habes, habeas cardia et cerebellum.)
To: grey_whiskers
FYI, the link you provided now goes to an expired search page.
THIS LINK should take folks to the text of S.1348
(Click on "Printer Friendly Display").
14
posted on
05/20/2007 12:49:28 PM PDT
by
calcowgirl
("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
To: grey_whiskers
“Got that? That is for ALL costs, including defense, prosecution, autopsies, translators, interpreters, court costs.
I hereby dub this bill “The Globalist Wet Dream and Mexico Ass-Kissing Act of 2007.”
This bill is treason.”
Nuff said!!
15
posted on
05/20/2007 12:50:06 PM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
To: calcowgirl
BAH!! It timed out on me several times during the cut and paste. Which link of mine is broken? The header information next to the date of my posting, or the one interior to the article?
Cheers!
16
posted on
05/20/2007 12:50:32 PM PDT
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: grey_whiskers
I am reminded that Senator Kennedy once wrote a children’s book (starring his Water Spaniel no joke, he has a swimming dog named “Splash”!) called How a Bill Becomes a Law.
I would like to see if that book actually says, “After years of doing nothing, a select cabal meet and hastily throw together a Mulligan stew which no one can possibly understand, and then get it passed with lightning speed, so that no one has a chance to see what is really hidden in the text. That is the way Uncle Ted does it, kiddies. Now, just for old time’s sake, shall we all take a ride across a rickity bridge?”
Cute.
I think that this bill should be the end of the McCain candidacy.
17
posted on
05/20/2007 12:50:56 PM PDT
by
docbnj
To: grey_whiskers
Correction... the Thompson link is accurate at the top of the thread.
The one that expired is in your post ("The site I am reading from is here.")
18
posted on
05/20/2007 12:52:24 PM PDT
by
calcowgirl
("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
To: docbnj
I think that this bill should be the end of the McCain candidacy.The some good will have come out of it.
19
posted on
05/20/2007 12:53:55 PM PDT
by
clintonh8r
(..taking down my picture of "President" Bush, Mrs. clintonh8r and me.)
To: grey_whiskers
The President is charged to take care that the laws be faithfully executed.
Our present laws in this matter are more than adequate.
No new laws are needed.
20
posted on
05/20/2007 12:57:03 PM PDT
by
Jim Noble
(We don't need to know what Cho thought. We need to know what Librescu thought.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson