To: Sleeping Beauty
20 lbs MORE is totally unacceptable.
36 posted on
05/18/2007 3:35:52 PM PDT by
Eagle Eye
(Pelosi Democrats agree with Al Queda more often than they agree with President Bush.)
To: Eagle Eye
"20 lbs MORE is totally unacceptable."
...agreed. Trying to bound and fire with than on would be out of the question.
41 posted on
05/18/2007 3:44:41 PM PDT by
familyop
(cbt. engr. (cbt.--has been))
To: Eagle Eye
42 posted on
05/18/2007 3:45:20 PM PDT by
familyop
(cbt. engr. (cbt.--has been))
To: Eagle Eye
and 5 times as expensive. And in some tests, didn’t work as well.
To: Eagle Eye
For the same coverage area, dragon skin is lighter than Interceptor. Since Dragon Skin is flexible and offers far more torso and wraparound side and back coverage it is heavier. You can reduce the coverage area to achieve less weight than Interceptor for the same coverage.
This is another example of the Army’s dishonesty in the matter. See the Pinnacle Armor site for the specific weights and coverage area in the May Army test.
93 posted on
05/24/2007 5:53:43 PM PDT by
njboy
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson