Bullet analysis used to justify the lone assassin theory behind President John F. Kennedy's assassination is based on flawed evidence..
Posted on 05/18/2007 6:16:13 AM PDT by msnpatriot
Bullet analysis used to justify the lone assassin theory behind President John F. Kennedy's assassination is based on flawed evidence, according to a team of researchers including a former top FBI scientist.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...
Bump. (To see where this thread goes..)
Once you fire more than one round from one location, anybody with a good ear and sense of direction, whether current or former military or not, should be able to tell with reasonable accuracy where the round came from.
.
How long is this Kennedy thing going to go on?
Bullet analysis used to justify the lone assassin theory behind President John F. Kennedy's assassination is based on flawed evidence..
That settles it. Lone gunman it is.
Oswald shot Kennedy because he was a communist... Oswald, that is, not Kennedy.
This thread is a good place to start a six-ways-to-Kevin-Bacon game. The first to make it from Charlie Chaplin wins a toaster.
They will still be looking for the purported “second gunman” a hundred years from now. It’s been 44 years since Kennedy was assassinated. The only one I can think of who might yet be subject to punishment is Castro, and he’s about to his end as well.
Thanks for that link, going there now.....
This investigation is just getting started...we are still working on Abe Lincoln’s assassination, too.
I think it was the buitler in the pantry with the candlestick...
Where is Kevin Cosner when you need him?
Charles Chaplin was in Countess from Hong Kong, A (1967) with Geraldine Chaplin. Geraldine Chaplin was in Chaplin (1992) with Diane Lane.
Diane Lane was in My Dog Skip (2000) with Kevin Bacon
Excuse me, but I don’t care who shot JFK 44 years ago.
He’s still dead.
As long as this cycle of recorded history lasts.
I am wondering why all the threads for JFK lately. I have no negatives on the guy, but just wonder why we have so many. Conspiracy theorists have been around forever so I don’t know why these are making a difference. Just wondering. I don’t mean to rain on anyones fun.
Excuse me, but I don’t care who shot JFK 44 years ago.
_____________
Exactly. Why bother with thorough investigations of any murder in which the alleged perp is himself murdered by another shady guy a couple of days later.
Do I need a sarcasm tag, or was it obviously enough implied?
/ admittedly skeptical of the offical report
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.