[SittinYonder]

I don’t agree with Paul on 9/11 or Iraq (although I do agree with him that we should have DECLARED WAR). However, silencing this man is not the answer - so much of what he says needs to be heard.

[Moose4]

Agreed. He shouldn’t be excluded from the debates. If you get past the foreign policy lunacy, he’s got some damn solid points on government reach and spending. The unfortunate thing is, his 9/11 remarks have overshadowed the fact that someone like Paul, who’s passionately (you could say fanatically) committed to small government and Constitutional limits, is a valuable resource to help drag the GOP back toward what it needs to be domestically—the party of Constitutional, controlled government.

}:-)4

[freedomdefender]

Yes, let’s let the back-room boys tell us who we can’t listen to at the debates. That’s real democracy. I wonder which candidate this guy is fronting for? Rudy? Romney? McCain? Maybe McCain, because McCain is already on record as an enemy of open debate and free speech (remember “Campaign Finance Reform”?)

[Sam Gamgee]

You said it. Until the debate I was suspicious that he was a Libertarian anti-war fruitcake - thank God he confirmed my suspicions and I no longer have to guess.