And President Bush? He has rejoined UNESCO, started paying dues again and ...is about to push to have Congress bring the United States under the Law of the Sea Treaty.
Quite a contrast between the conservative (Reagan) and the "compassionate" one-worlder (Bush).
People don't seem to form the connection between Putin's recent anti-USA rhetoric with the fact that we have been putting assets all along Russia's border.
Great article. I agree 100% with what he says here.
It’s all good except the NATO part. I disagree with his opinion that we should turn it over to Europe. One only need to listen to Putin for awhile to understand while our involvement in NATO is still relevant.
Go Pat Go!
What is wrong with Mr. Bush? I mean, supporting the Law of the Sea Treaty ??!! Let’s get the ears of our Congress people on this — against this.
I’m so sick of having a Democrat in the White House under conservative GOP guise. Mr. Buchanan’s rightness on this stuff illustrates the thin dime between the two major parties is beginning to feel like tin foil. It would matter NOT in policy or direction for the nation in general whether there is an Edwards or Giuliani in the White House (I just saw the Edwards 47% to Giuliani’s 45% poll thread).
Actually, Mr. Buchanan’s article revives very much feeling that the men nominated and elected are controlled by someone else anyway ; a feeling that elections don’t much matter at all any more.
I will still vote.
All I can say is, “Do we need Duncan Hunter, or not?!!!” I supported Pat Buchanan in his run, as did, I believe Rep. Hunter. I once suggested that NWO-NAU Bush should be impeached and got my post deleted by the moderator. It is high time this country came out of the Globalist Bushes!
So come on, make my day.
I don’t agree with Buchanan 100 percent of the time, but I do agree with 100 percent of this particular article.
There are a lot of people in the Republican party - especially Buches 41 and 43 - who are trying to move America towards a one world government. The elder Bush even loved using the phrase “new world order”. Problem is, most of the rest of the world is socialist or totalitarian. I have no intention of being subjected to their laws.
Best is the devolution of power. Get out of the IMF, the world bank, the UN, and NATO. They have outlived their usefulness, as Buchanan points out. Then force the federal government to start living under their enumerated power.
It is no mistake that in 3 years of law school, my ultralib professors never mentioned the 10th amendment. The were far more interested in just how far you can stretch the 14 amendment and commerce clauses instead. For lawyers, libs, and “one world order” Repubs, government is all about putting all power into as few hands as possible.