Skip to comments.
BIN LADEN'S FATWA (Why Ron Paul was Factually Correct) (UBL cited Iraq in 1996 Declaration of War)
PBS Online Newshour ^
| Unknown
| PBS
Posted on 05/15/2007 8:04:25 PM PDT by Remember_Salamis
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260, 261-275 last
To: MitchellC
try to prove that America “had it coming,”
That is not my point at all. My point was/is and will be that Bin laden in HIS thinking stated that HE was unhappy with America’s foreign policy.
I don't know what your point or misunderstanding is and don't even want to know, as my post wasn’t to you at all.
Never ever have I thought felt or said we “had it coming” those are YOUR and Bin Laden’s words. Not Mind. I spend all my time on FR on the World Terrorism thread sharing information and news. GOOD GREIF
To: DAVEY CROCKETT
That was not the intention behind my comment. (Although I do think that Ron Paul’s comments at the debate, particularly the part drawing moral equivalence between Muslim terrorism and Americans defending ourselves in a hypothetical attack from the Chinese, were dangerously close to the “we had it coming” way of thinking.)
To: Remember_Salamis
So Ron Paul has more in common with Osama Bin Laden then he does with Ronald Reagan and you think that HELPS him?
Simply amazing how the very people who would be screaming “Traitor” if someone on the Left said this are busy manufacturing excuses for this lunatic.
Tehran Paul is actively propagandizing for Al Qeda. He not only is unfit for the Presidency, he is unfit to stay in Congress.
263
posted on
05/19/2007 10:23:48 AM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(If you will try being smarter, I will try being nicer.)
To: Remember_Salamis
India and Russia have been attacked. China actually has seen event it has described as terrorism. Whether this is islamist terrorism or justified Uyghur national resistance is another story.
However, you are utterly ignorant.
264
posted on
05/19/2007 2:27:54 PM PDT
by
rmlew
(It's WW4 and the Left wants to negotiate with Islamists who want to kill us , for their mutual ends)
To: DAVEY CROCKETT
Try again.
The US aided Al Qaeda's opposition within the Mujihadeen.
Our problem was not too much involvement, but too little. We essentually gave money to the Pakeistani ISI (their Islamist-controled CIA). The ISI created the Taliban and has helped Bin LAden.
You on the other hand are quoted communists.
265
posted on
05/19/2007 2:32:44 PM PDT
by
rmlew
(It's WW4 and the Left wants to negotiate with Islamists who want to kill us , for their mutual ends)
To: Remember_Salamis
Yes; it does matter WHY they do things. It does not matter whether an opponent is evil or not; the Nazis were evil, and it definitely mattered WHY they did things.Actually, according the distorted reality these Ron Paul idiots live within, the Nazi's were perfectly justified.
We left the German people broken, poor and helpless after WWI. Our actions against them are far, far worse than anything we have done in the middle east.
Of course, these useful idiots don't have the testicular fortitude to defend the Nazi's like they defend Al Qaeda.
266
posted on
05/19/2007 2:53:51 PM PDT
by
Erik Latranyi
(The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
To: rmlew; MitchellC
We essentually gave money to the Pakeistani ISI (their Islamist-controled CIA). The ISI created the Taliban and has helped Bin LAden.
You on the other hand are quoted communists.
We essentially said the same thing. Post 260 explains all we know at this time history. See below post 260....
Do some research before you call me a communists.
I do more on FR to fight terrorism than you know. This is my ongoing thread...
World Terrorism: News, History and Research Of A Changing World #8 Security Watch
Posted on 04/15/2007 7:43:46 PM EDT by DAVEY CROCKETT
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1817890/posts?q=1&;page=2851
With all this said would the 2 of you leave me alone or get on the ‘lets fight terrorism boat?’
To: DAVEY CROCKETT
(laugh) No one is stalking you. Stop trying to make yourself into a martyr over a friendly disagreement.
To: MNJohnnie
He is not propagandizing for al-Qaida.
Is the prosecutor who is explaining the motive of a killer justifying the murder? Get Real! NeoConservatives crack me up. They'll sacrifice any and all liberties for a little military glory. It's probably because many of their loudest voices never serves.
If you think Iraq is such a splendid campaign, why don't you re-up, go back to bein' an 11-Bravo? If it's such a great cause, go for it!
269
posted on
05/20/2007 2:17:15 PM PDT
by
Remember_Salamis
(A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one!)
To: Erik Latranyi
Erik, tell me how explaining somebody's motive for committing a crime is justifying said crime?
You are absolutely right -- We left the German people broken, poor and helpless after WWI. That was a contributing factor to the rise of the Nazis. But that does not justify their actions.
If you don't understand the difference between describing a criminal's motivations and justifying their actions, I feel sorry for you.
270
posted on
05/20/2007 2:19:59 PM PDT
by
Remember_Salamis
(A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one!)
To: DAVEY CROCKETT
I did not call you a communist. I noted that you were using communist new organs as sources.
271
posted on
05/20/2007 10:11:33 PM PDT
by
rmlew
(It's WW4 and the Left wants to negotiate with Islamists who want to kill us , for their mutual ends)
To: Remember_Salamis
If you don't understand the difference between describing a criminal's motivations and justifying their actions, I feel sorry for you.I understand the difference. Unfortunately, many politicians do not.
This is one of those cases.
272
posted on
05/23/2007 8:42:04 AM PDT
by
Erik Latranyi
(The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
To: rmlew
273
posted on
06/04/2007 2:14:55 AM PDT
by
rmlew
(It's WW4 and the Left wants to negotiate with Islamists who want to kill us , for their mutual ends)
To: CatHerder
Do you believe in a concept of “muslim lands”?
You realize that those who do are Islamic supremacists. They are just as against people of the same racial/national heritage who convert away from Islam as they are against “kufir” from the West.
Saying that “we shouldn’t be there” is to say that we have no right to be there. Like segregation much?
274
posted on
07/03/2007 5:00:26 PM PDT
by
weegee
(If the Fairness Doctrine is imposed on USA who will CNN news get to read the conservative rebuttal)
To: oldleft
275
posted on
12/22/2010 1:11:46 PM PST
by
erod
(Unlike the President I am a true Chicagoan.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260, 261-275 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson