Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gondramB
Bear in mind that scientific theories are never “proved” the way theories in math can be proved. They are only accepted based on the evidence and usefulness of the theory. Usefulness has to do with the ability to predict correctly.

You must admit, though, that scientists use the language of metaphysical certainty to express results. At best, it is "the best guess we can come up with so far."

129 posted on 05/13/2007 8:14:54 PM PDT by AmishDude (It doesn't matter whom you vote for. It matters who takes office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]


To: AmishDude

>>You must admit, though, that scientists use the language of metaphysical certainty to express results. At best, it is “the best guess we can come up with so far.”<<

Yes. That is particularly true of people who have not had a super high level of science education and/or are insecure about their own knowledge.

A perfect example would be the equation F=ma (force = mass * acceleration). You’ll see that presented as a fact but its only true if the mass doesn’t change (i.e. it doesn’t work for rockets) so there is a more complex form. And the more complex form is only approximately true because it doesn’t take relativity into consideration. But does a 6th grade science teacher know that, maybe and maybe not.


164 posted on 05/14/2007 9:17:52 AM PDT by gondramB (God only has ten rules, uncle Hank, and he has a much bigger house.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson