I'm for Fred Thompson at this point, even though he hasn't declared. I'm not afraid to announce that. If you don't like it, or you don't think it's prudent, fine.
Yet that doesn't mean I'll fold my hand come election should Fred Thompson NOT be the nominee. But that's how you're coming across.
You, however, won't even answer a simply put, clear question. Actually Two: 1) Will you vote for Fred Thompson should he become the Republican Presidential nominee? 2) Will you vote for Mitt Romney, knowing he's stated pro-choice opinions, should he become the Republican Presidential nominee? The answer please; yes or no on each. No ambiguity, no spin.
Oh, and President Bush has NOT been naive. He's been too silent on issues, hasn't gotten out in front of issues, hasn't been as strong as I like on issues; such as immigration, a winner-takes-all approach to the WOT; Iraq especially, taking the DIMocrats to task on security, TAKING THE DIMOCRATS TO COURT FOR TREASON. But he hasn't been naive.
Don't give me this garbage about 'let's be grown up now'. Don't even think about patronizing me. You don't have what it takes, buddy. If you want to show how grown up you are, don't waffle, don't hesitate, tell us what you think. Answer questions FORTHRIGHTLY, with conviction and sincerity.
I await your reply to the two questions proposed (again) above. Get them behind you.
I've addressed what I've been asked, until now. But your approach is more of an attack than I'd care to bother with. Happy Mother's Day.