[Always Right]

I knew you wouldn’t backup your absurd claim. To be fair you would never be able to back it up.

???? Back up what? That homebuyers would perfer to spend 20-30% less? That kind of falls into the category the sky is blue.

[Hostage]

Once again you are evading your claim. You said it makes no difference that the NRST is financed in the mortgage of a new home.

Back that up or give up.

Either way you are going to look like a fool.

It’s not my fault, you did it and are doing it to yourself.

[Phantom Lord]

???? Back up what? That homebuyers would perfer to spend 20-30% less? That kind of falls into the category the sky is blue.

Market conditions drive the price of homes, both new and used. Existing housing will not have an instant 20-30% "advantage" for lack of a better word. Around 22% of a new homes price is already embedded taxes, which would be replaced by the FairTax for a net effect on the price of zero.

And as a supposed home builder, do you price a new construction home at consistent and flat X% over cost or do you get as much as the market will pay you?