Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LightBeam
First of all, no actions taken to defend this country from total destruction are "illegal" by definition.

How far out should we project that? Technically, any nation that is not the United States could potentially destroy us somewhere down the road. Should we just pre-emptively take over the world? Are you ready to pre-emptively strike China? I mean, they've GOT the ICBM's that can hit L.A., Chicago, NY...

408 posted on 05/10/2007 12:15:10 PM PDT by Rutles4Ever (Ubi Petrus, ibi ecclesia, et ubi ecclesia vita eterna)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 391 | View Replies ]


To: Rutles4Ever
How far out should we project that? Technically, any nation that is not the United States could potentially destroy us somewhere down the road. Should we just pre-emptively take over the world? Are you ready to pre-emptively strike China? I mean, they've GOT the ICBM's that can hit L.A., Chicago, NY...

I'm willing to "project that" as far out as the CIC discerns we need to take it.

If we had pre-emptively attacked China before they had the capability to arm themselves with ICBMs we wouldn't be in the position we are in today.

But since we can't change the past, yes, I would support a strategic strike against China post haste....especially if it means our long term survival or not.

And THAT is why we're in Iraq, in case you haven't noticed.
416 posted on 05/10/2007 1:36:24 PM PDT by LightBeam (Support the Surge. Support Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 408 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson