Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

REPUBLICAN CONGRESSMEN TAKE IT TO BUSH (Iraq war - RINOs join the Dem coup attempt)
Drudge Report.com ^ | May 09 2007 | staff

Posted on 05/09/2007 5:55:32 PM PDT by kellynla

TIM RUSSERT, NBC NIGHTLY NEWS: Brian, all eyes on the Republican party. How long will they support the president's position on the Iraq War? Yesterday may have been a defining, pivotal moment.

At two-thirty in the afternoon, in the private quarters of the White House, the Solarium Room, eleven Republican congressmen had a private meeting with the president, the secretary of defense, the secretary of state, the chief political advisor Karl Rove, and the White House Press Secretary Tony Snow, and others.

This delegation was headed by Mark Kirk of Illinois and Charlie Dent of Pennsylvania. It was, in the words of one of the participants, the most unvarnished conversation they've ever had with the president.

Another member has said he has met with three presidents and never been so candid. They told the president, and one said, quote, "My district is prepared for defeat. We need candor, we need honesty, Mr. President."

The president responded, "I don't want to pass this off to another president. I don't want to pass this off, particularly, to a democratic president," underscoring he understood how serious the situation was.

Brian, the Republican congressmen went on to say, "The word about the war and its progress cannot come from the White House or even you, Mr. President. There's no longer any credibility. It has to come from General Petraeus.

The meeting lasted an hour and fifteen minutes, and was, in the words of one, " remarkable for the bluntness, and no holds barred honesty and the message delivered by all these Republican congressmen.

BRIAN WILLIAMS: And Tim...how did the president react and how did this then affect the instructions for VP Cheney heading off to Iraq?

RUSSERT: One congressman said, "How can our daughters and sons spill their blood while the Iraqi parliament goes on vacation? The president responded, "The Vice President is over there to tell them, 'Do not go on vacation.'"

Developing...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dhimmis; gop; iraq; potus; rmsp; spartansixdelta; war; weloseiraqwescrewed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 461-464 next last
To: Owen; Jim Robinson

Thank you, Owen. ;o)


221 posted on 05/09/2007 11:19:09 PM PDT by dixiechick2000 (There ought to be one day-- just one-- when there is open season on senators. ~~ Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
One congressman had it right BEFORE we sent troops into Iraq. He called for a Formal Congressional Declaration of War. But who didn't want one? Bush and many of the GOP and DEMs. Bush knows about as much about running a war as The Three Stooges knew about Rocket Science. He went in with the full intent of nation building and not to eliminate the threat he spoke of in Iraq. If he wanted Saddam gone a Letter of Marque or Reprisal could have done it just as well.

You can't run a war on bargain basement budgets dragging them out for years and years and not expect citizens to question the sanity of it.

Bush like LBJ sent good men into combat with hideous R.O.E.'s written by state department liberal morons and thus the end result. Bush ignored that "D*** Piece of paper as he calls it and sent troops to war without a congressional declaration of war. He and congress ignored the wisdom of George Washington and used U.N. propaganda as the reason. The authorization for use of force was a farce and now we see the end result. LBJ got one about like it for Nam called Gulf of Tonkin Resolution. I can't believe the GOP made the same stupid mistake as well.

Is Bush smarter than LBJ? No! As one poster put it he's running even with Carter another POTUS with no military knowledge and planning skills. I hope a true conservative gets in the White House in 2009 and the Bush/Cheney era for this nation is finally at last over. Those three Bush Sr and Junior along with Clinton have nearly destroyed our military with their bad judgments on military polices. Cheney didn't help matters either.

If Bush and congress had let the soldiers do their job to start with and not labeled certain things hands off it would have been a quick war. He prevented them from leveling Iraq from day one they would have been home several years ago had they done so. Bush wanted a nation building legacy instead. Iraq will never be stable. The hate there is thousands of years old. What next rebuild Babylons for them? He's already building an improved Iraq for the next dictator the radical clerics install. How many will die for that mistake? You don't go to war to build nations but rather destroy them. That is what Bush can not comprehend.

222 posted on 05/09/2007 11:33:37 PM PDT by cva66snipe (Kool Aid! The popular American favorite drink now Made In Mexico. Pro-Open Borders? Drink Up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas

“Who leaked?”

Probably one of the guys who got their name mentioned in the paper, part of the background deal to show he is standing up to the president, or something like that. Everything in politics is calculated. Because if it isn’t, you aren’t politiking.


223 posted on 05/09/2007 11:44:26 PM PDT by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: RacerX1128

Of course there have been wars like this one.....the US just didnt participate in one yet...


224 posted on 05/09/2007 11:46:56 PM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: bray

When you REALLY think about this...

remember that your Senator is Gordon Smith.

:o(


225 posted on 05/09/2007 11:49:27 PM PDT by dixiechick2000 (There ought to be one day-- just one-- when there is open season on senators. ~~ Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: kellynla; All

The problem with Bush is that he isn’t articulating progress in Iraq very well. I would have only 3-5 bullets, no more:

1) Ensuring the fundamentals of self-governance are in place (i don’t care if it is democrat or shari law)

2) Ensuring basic utility infrastructures are in place in two to three major cities, no more.

3) Ensure that there is new iraqi army is in place to kill the insurgents, rather than coalition kill them.

And THAT would be my three barometers for success. have a few points under each of those to determine indicators of success and be done with it. If the indicators are met by next spring, then downscope the troops. That way, Bush can say he ended the war on his terms. This B.S. that him and Gates continually repeat “we don’t know how long its going to last,” and “nobody knows what success is” is getting pretty old. Let the iraqis govern iraq. We need to concentrate on pounding Iran.


226 posted on 05/09/2007 11:49:57 PM PDT by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Either way you cut it, and for whatever reason or for whomever or whatever to blame, this whole thing is one big f'in mess.

One for the history books, that's for sure.

227 posted on 05/10/2007 1:04:47 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dengar01
Please.

Don't confuse us with FACTS.

We are too busy being close-minded.

228 posted on 05/10/2007 1:07:36 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Bombard
If the Republicans abandon President Bush I will set this next election out. I do not make this decision lightly. A party that abandons its leader during war deserves not to govern and perhaps should not exist at all. Rinos are killing the GOP.

I agree. If the RINOs abandon President Bush and we lose Iraq, I will no longer be a registered Republican.

It would be time for us to leave the party en masse and form a new party (a coalition similiar to what the Republicans consist today only that we have balls)

229 posted on 05/10/2007 1:15:31 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican (Everyone that doesn't like what America and President Bush has done for Iraq can all go to HELL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe
I have been looking for such precise words for the last year or so to express that sentiment.

- It is not unpatriotic--nor are we "DU plants on FR" to call a spade a spade, to read the handwriting on the wall, and say this is one big massive four-year FUBAR both in planning and execution as well as overal general assumptions (total victory trajectory vs. "nation building" for example), for precisely the eloquent reasons you have articulated. You would think we would have learned a few things in this country from the 1960s and 1970s about NO-WIN WARS run by stupid bureaucrats who don't know what troops want and can do, and who often can't even park their own bicycles straight. Our troops never deserved this morass, as great as they are. Nor did the country. It is a shame we returned to our vomit and did not learn some important lessons.

230 posted on 05/10/2007 1:16:42 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratproud
Don’t take that weak approach and pin this on the President.

I stand by my statement. The White House hasn't done much to inspire confidence among GOP ranks. Republicans are still reeling from the loss of the House and Senate in November; and remember this was after the great consigliere himself, Rove, repeatedly assured them that this would not happen. Relations have understandably deteriorated between the GOP ranks and the WH after that debacle.

Then you have the WH's mind numbing ineptitude regarding the firing of the U.S. Attorneys. A non-scandal that was allowed to transform into a big ugly political/media circus. Hell, I bet even the democrats really can't believe their good fortune on this issue.

Finally, the post war transformation of Iraq has been bungled. The rules of engagement remain a joke. It's really anyone's guess even four years into the occupation if the Sunnis and the Shiites will actually be able live and work together in a unified post-Saddam Iraq. Like I said before, I'm afraid that the country will have to be partitioned at some point.

231 posted on 05/10/2007 1:56:16 AM PDT by Cyropaedia ("Virtue cannot separate itself from reality without becoming a principal of evil...".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratproud

Putnam who?

Boehner is important because he not only represents his views, he’s speaking for others in the House as the Minority Leader.


232 posted on 05/10/2007 2:05:29 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: sport
Why?

You know why.

233 posted on 05/10/2007 2:08:59 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
The president responded, "I don't want to pass this off to another president. I don't want to pass this off, particularly, to a democratic president," underscoring he understood how serious the situation was.

Then start leading in the information warfare against the media. You're like a boxer who throws one shot per round. Every now and then a couple months apart, you'll give a key speech. Then you'll retreat again.

I heard Hannity explaining that you're just not any good at media. This is a flippin' war. Forget good and just get in the fight.

It reminds me of that scene of Tom Cruise's in "Top Gun" when they just kept yelling at him to engage.

234 posted on 05/10/2007 2:29:14 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

How is it that the minutes of a PRIVATE meeting between Republican members of Congress and the President make their way to Tim Russert within mere hours?

Who requested the meeting?
Who leaked word of the meeting to Russert?
What ‘typeface’ is Russert using?

If these events are true, some RINOs set this whole thing up as a big CYA for their political careers, methinks.

I really wish the President would do an interview with Rush on the WOT in general and on this incident in particular. Won’t happen, will it? It should.


235 posted on 05/10/2007 3:21:02 AM PDT by golas1964 (If my dog had Hillary's face, I'd shave her butt and teach her to walk backwards!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
I have not read all the comments here, but I get the distinct impression most people are concerned over the presidents “bully pulpit” responses. You must realize that all responses are filtered through the MSM, and are tuned, tweaked and mutilated to fit their agenda. Tell me when was the last time you seen a republican congressman or senator on the MSM? If they were not RINOS, it wasn't going to happen. When the republicans controlled congress, all you saw in the MSM was democrats responding to them and spewing their views. The game is fixed, and we cannot do anything about it but complain on the internet. Now is not the time to go wobbly, or the MSM has won the game!
236 posted on 05/10/2007 3:44:30 AM PDT by old cro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just A Nobody

Thanks, Just a Nobody .... your list mirrors mine except I did not have Bob Goodlatte. But I like your choice.

It is a difficult question. When I ask it in public, people will say that is easy and tick off 1-2 senators, and 3-4 congresscritters. And then they start stammering. In reality, that is just plain down right pathetique to this ole farm boy. pathetique, pathetique, pathetique ......


237 posted on 05/10/2007 3:47:00 AM PDT by HiramQuick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

This is a good thing, it shouldn’t be described any other way. Bush needs to know he has one chance left, the surge, it’s all up to Patreaus, and if he fails, well, we’re gone.


238 posted on 05/10/2007 4:10:16 AM PDT by moose2004 (You Can Run But You Can't Hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IndyTiger

Very well said.


239 posted on 05/10/2007 4:11:04 AM PDT by moose2004 (You Can Run But You Can't Hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cyropaedia
I'm afraid that the country will have to be partitioned at some point.

This would be bad because...? I think that such a partition would have served our interests better than the current situation to begin with.
240 posted on 05/10/2007 4:18:11 AM PDT by Old_Mil (Duncan Hunter in 2008! A Veteran, A Patriot, A Reagan Republican... http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 461-464 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson