Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

REPUBLICAN CONGRESSMEN TAKE IT TO BUSH (Iraq war - RINOs join the Dem coup attempt)
Drudge Report.com ^ | May 09 2007 | staff

Posted on 05/09/2007 5:55:32 PM PDT by kellynla

TIM RUSSERT, NBC NIGHTLY NEWS: Brian, all eyes on the Republican party. How long will they support the president's position on the Iraq War? Yesterday may have been a defining, pivotal moment.

At two-thirty in the afternoon, in the private quarters of the White House, the Solarium Room, eleven Republican congressmen had a private meeting with the president, the secretary of defense, the secretary of state, the chief political advisor Karl Rove, and the White House Press Secretary Tony Snow, and others.

This delegation was headed by Mark Kirk of Illinois and Charlie Dent of Pennsylvania. It was, in the words of one of the participants, the most unvarnished conversation they've ever had with the president.

Another member has said he has met with three presidents and never been so candid. They told the president, and one said, quote, "My district is prepared for defeat. We need candor, we need honesty, Mr. President."

The president responded, "I don't want to pass this off to another president. I don't want to pass this off, particularly, to a democratic president," underscoring he understood how serious the situation was.

Brian, the Republican congressmen went on to say, "The word about the war and its progress cannot come from the White House or even you, Mr. President. There's no longer any credibility. It has to come from General Petraeus.

The meeting lasted an hour and fifteen minutes, and was, in the words of one, " remarkable for the bluntness, and no holds barred honesty and the message delivered by all these Republican congressmen.

BRIAN WILLIAMS: And Tim...how did the president react and how did this then affect the instructions for VP Cheney heading off to Iraq?

RUSSERT: One congressman said, "How can our daughters and sons spill their blood while the Iraqi parliament goes on vacation? The president responded, "The Vice President is over there to tell them, 'Do not go on vacation.'"

Developing...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dhimmis; gop; iraq; potus; rmsp; spartansixdelta; war; weloseiraqwescrewed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 461-464 next last
To: ArmyBratproud

Is Boehner retiring from Congress?


161 posted on 05/09/2007 8:20:52 PM PDT by jrooney (The democrats are the friend of our enemy and the enemy of our friends. Attack them, not GW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

The nutless 11.


162 posted on 05/09/2007 8:22:54 PM PDT by WildWeasel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny

Why?


163 posted on 05/09/2007 8:23:17 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

I am uninformed voter, here me roar.


164 posted on 05/09/2007 8:24:24 PM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

There were post election polls in districts that turned Dem.

Most of the numbers showed that it was not Iraq. Dem numbers did not really climb from the last off president election year. Republican number declined.

Meaning that it was not swing voters. Republican base members stayed home because they had, according to many of the polls, a view that Republicans had become corrupt and were spending too much money.

Two things pushed this.

A. A solid message between dems and media to accuse republican corruption.
B. A lack of education of the voters, making it easy to push the overspending line towards republicans.
Democrats actually wanted to spend 40 percent more. Republicans stripped that from the budget.

Most of the spending was part of the mandatory spending. THAT CAN’T BE CHANGED BY THE CONGRESS CRITTERS. Takes a miracle of a vote! Dems knew what they were doing when they slowly snuck in mandatory spending rules over a number of years.


165 posted on 05/09/2007 8:25:44 PM PDT by ArmyBratproud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Libertarian444

Boehner.

No shock there. His title as “Comfortable Caucus” is for real. People on the Hill still call him that. He hates Delay for that. Delay gave him the nickname.

Face, folks in Ohio have been duped by Boehner for years.

He is not a fighter for conservatives. But then again, most of the folks in Ohio, like NY, don’t really know what being conservative means.


166 posted on 05/09/2007 8:28:01 PM PDT by ArmyBratproud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
One congressman said, "How can our daughters and sons spill their blood while the Iraqi parliament goes on vacation? The president responded, "The Vice President is over there to tell them, 'Do not go on vacation.'"

A U.S. Congressman wishes to lecture people about going on vacation> LOL!

Bush should have said "So what. You people don't do anything and yet you go on vacation. These people have a war going on in their country and they probably need a vacation more than you do. Now get the hell out of my office and don't come back unless you have something meaningful to contribute."

167 posted on 05/09/2007 8:30:16 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyropaedia

Don’t take that weak approach and pin this on the President.

IT WAS CONGRESSIONAL MEMBERS WHO DID THIS TODAY.

I am amazed at how many folks here will try to pin things on the President...when it is the back stabbing, turncoat, rino actions performed by the Congressional Republicans that is listed in the story!


168 posted on 05/09/2007 8:30:54 PM PDT by ArmyBratproud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: IndyTiger

As long as 3 or 4 Americans are knocked off daily and there are car bombs blowing up dozens of civilians daily, I find it hard for an President, no matter how good an orator he is, to make a good arguement...


169 posted on 05/09/2007 8:39:34 PM PDT by ruschpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Any spineless POS who governs by polls isn't worth a bucket of spit.


170 posted on 05/09/2007 8:41:18 PM PDT by RasterMaster ("Redeploy" DUmocrats to IRAN! Keep our enemies in one place!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

You said, about what Bush should say to those guys — “Now get the hell out of my office and don’t come back unless you have something meaningful to contribute.”

And so, this is how Bush got to the White House, huh? Telling all those people he doesn’t agree with to “get the hell out of my office”.... ummm..., yeah, that should do it...


171 posted on 05/09/2007 8:41:24 PM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Brian, the Republican congressmen went on to say, "The word about the war and its progress cannot come from the White House or even you, Mr. President. There's no longer any credibility. It has to come from General Petraeus.

Why bother ...Murtha and the Media are already calling General Petraeus a liar

What can General Petraeus do that the President hasn't already done a thousand times

It comes down to this ... either we want to win this damn war or we don't

172 posted on 05/09/2007 8:43:12 PM PDT by Mo1 ( http://www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
"Rasmussen called every seat correct in 2002, 2004 and 2006. You are a joke. If you choose to believe the biased pro-terrorist polling firms, go right ahead. Bashing Rasmussen proves you are a bitter jerk who hates President Bush and support the terrorist plan for Iraq more enough to dismiss accurate polls. Bin Laden was right about people like you." Ditto!
173 posted on 05/09/2007 8:44:25 PM PDT by bw17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: All
Mr President I support your leadership in the War on Terrorism including the war front in Iraq. I want to support your war against these weasels and traitors. Go after the surrendering cowards including the those in the GOP, the Dem’s and the media. I will stand with you to the end. Fight, G-d dammit!
174 posted on 05/09/2007 8:44:35 PM PDT by free_life
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
They told the president, and one said, quote, "My district is prepared for defeat. We need candor, we need honesty, Mr. President."

Gee, don't go whining to the POTUS with such a request, by golly there are plenty of outlets in the MSM that can cater to you.

175 posted on 05/09/2007 8:45:34 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jrooney

Doubt it. Wish he would.
Look, the guy has the job he wants. He threw Delay under the bus and did a lobby job with members to get him out of the Majority Leader position. Most members knew ‘06 was lost at that point. Because Boehner sucks as a message guy and a leader. He can’t hold ranks together to save his life. Hence the 11 rinos (him included) who went to stab W in the back today in a “Secret Meeting”...which they leaked to the press. Keep in mind, Boehner blew it in ‘06. When Delay left the Leadership, many Republicans started writing off ‘06. Staffers were told in Jan of ‘06 that there was a strong possibility of going to the minority. How sad is that. No fight at all. Had they taken a different attitude, Republicans would likely still be in the majority.
Every time something was thrown at them, they ran and hid. Just as the Dems wanted. So the only message out there was the Dem message.

Much of it should be pinned on Denny and Boehner.
Remember, Delay and Boehner have long been enemies. Goes back to when Boehner took on Newt.
A lot of crap went down. Armey and Delay said they were sorry. Boehner was arrogant. Newt knocked Boehner out a climb up the ladder...and it set Armey, Delay, JC and Denny up for a mad run. When JC moved on...Boehner started hitting open slots, and now he is back.

Most members have mentioned that they wanted to vote for Pence for Republican leader. But when Barton jumped in and then jumped out of that caucus race...it weakened if for Pence. Which is what the intent was.

SOOOO, They all voted for Boehner...because they had a feeling Pence would not bounce back before the final caucus vote. And Boehner had sent word...committee appointments would be affected.

Don’t care what Xray machine you are using...at that point...you won’t find any spine in the caucus. So Boehner won. And just like the horrible job he did in the crucial time of ‘06...he is doing it now. He has the worst track record has far as keeping caucus votes together.

But for some reason, some are afraid. Mainly because many of the remaining Republicans were not in the minority the last time. Boehner was. So they don’t know the floor procedure rules all that well, and have to rely on his rino a$$. When you are the minority , it is not fun, but it is easy. You just force the majority to bad votes. As has been happening. I blame many of the members who have been there for 3-4 terms...and still have NOT learned procedure.
It is important, because if you don’t know it in the House, the majority will break rules left and right and blow stuff right past ya.

Worse news. Denny H. will likely leave before the end of the year. Yet another seat that is up for grabs.


176 posted on 05/09/2007 8:49:05 PM PDT by ArmyBratproud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: caisson71

Yup truly a pukeworthy if not traitorous display on the congressmen’s parts


177 posted on 05/09/2007 8:49:36 PM PDT by f150sound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ken21
...and the war has dragged on far too long.

Sorry, sport, but would you care to remind us how long we had (or is it 'have had') troops in Japan and Germany, after we beat the tar out of them? If I remember correctly, we did NOT withdraw our forces from Japan or Germany in 1949...

178 posted on 05/09/2007 8:49:36 PM PDT by Who is John Galt? ( "He therefore who may resist, must be allowed to strike." - John Locke, 1690)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

Spot on, sir.


179 posted on 05/09/2007 8:50:23 PM PDT by Timbo64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

He got to where he is with poll approvals ratings in the tank because he is perceived to be weak. No one respects him which is evidenced by this article. He should have been playing hardball with these sniveling weaklings a long time ago. How come they have not been supporting this war instead of wanting to cut and run.

Yes, he should have thrown him out of his office the minute they did not show the proper respect for the Presidency and for the troops.


180 posted on 05/09/2007 8:54:09 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 461-464 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson