Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Chena
I think there is a difference between honest debates between, and about, all of the Republican candidates, and an organized “swift-boating” of one of them.

Last I checked, the Swifties sank Kerry by telling the truth about his past. Since when is telling the truth about someone a bad thing?

I’ve done some studying lately and found that some here, including the owner of this forum, had attacked George W. Bush in a similar manner when he was first running for President.

And many of the concerns expressed about Bush back then have come to haunt the GOP since - especially spending in the guise of compassionate conservatism.

However, at least Bush was half conservative. Rudy's maybe 20 percent and shrinking every time he opens his yap.

122 posted on 05/09/2007 1:53:33 PM PDT by dirtboy (JimRob's 12th Commandment: Thou shall not trash actual pubbies on FR to pimp false pubbies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy

Yes, the Swift Boats were telling the truth about Kerry. I probably should refer to this particular situation as “swift-boating”. Let’s call it a lynching of a Republican candidate by some Republicans. I would prefer that people simply debate the pros and cons of each candidate and then simply make a personal decision on who they wish to support. I don’t believe that it is in the best interest of the Republican party to actively work at destroying one of our candidates when it would have been wiser and more productive to spend that time and effort on supporting one or more of the other candidates.


141 posted on 05/09/2007 2:07:39 PM PDT by Chena (Why settle for less when you could have the best! Fred Thompson for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson