Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nothing to Cheer About: Smoking ban violates business owner’s property rights.
Goldwater Institute ^

Posted on 05/08/2007 9:03:55 AM PDT by Reagan Fellow

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: mysterio

make that ‘being’ lol


41 posted on 05/08/2007 3:57:36 PM PDT by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Madame Dufarge
Your condescension is palpable. I sniff a "career" in Sociology or something equally useful like phrenology.

Actually, I'm a phone sanitizer;)

I am an engineer by day and occasionally, a waiter /restaurant manager by night. I have had to work in restaurants to make ends meet. Sometimes very smoky restaurants. So I have some knowledge of the subject.

As for the "canard" that second hand smoke is harmful, do you deny that tobacco smoke contains carcinogens? Do you deny that smoking causes serious illnesses? Can you cite a scientific study that proves that heavy exposure to second-hand smoke is hamless?

42 posted on 05/08/2007 4:49:46 PM PDT by NY.SS-Bar9 (DR #1692 P100 in 07?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: NY.SS-Bar9; Madame Dufarge
I am an engineer by day and occasionally, a waiter /restaurant manager by night

You forgot nanny-statist.

I spent 15 hours working at the local Moose Lodge over 3 days last week. I guarantee you I was exposed to more toxins and noxious fumes in the 3 hours I spent cooking in the kitchen than I did in the 12 hours tending bar, in a smoker friendly bar.

I get paid to tend bar, cooking is volunteer time - in other words - I CHOOSE TO DO IT. Just like you choose to enter an establishment that permits smoking.

As to your canard in a previous post about owners not going smoke-free voluntarily, you're out of your mind. When Washington D.C. banned smoking in bars and restaurants more than 75% were already smoke-free.......BY THE OWNERS' CHOICE. What more do you people want?

Our (formerly*)favorite restaurant has been smoke-free since it openned, it never stopped us from going there. One of our favorite lunch places has also always been that way, and that owner is extremely vocal in his opposition to a total ban because he doesn't wish to lose his clientele.

Your support of government forced smoking bans is destroying the market niche business owners have created for themselves by going smoke-free on their own.

*(formerly*) favorite restaurant has nothing to do with the smoke-free policy.........I don't do business with people that cater to illegal aliens and stopped patronizing the establishment after the owner was arrested for running a brothel that caters to illegals.

43 posted on 05/08/2007 5:20:56 PM PDT by Gabz (Nemo me impune lacessit (Latin for "No-one provokes me with impunity"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: NY.SS-Bar9
I have had to work in restaurants to make ends meet

I remember that time I had to work as an alligator wrestler to make ends meet. It was the only job available in the entire universe. Talk about risky.

You have to work in "very smoky" restaurants? Who would believe this?

Do you deny that smoking causes serious illnesses?

So what? Life causes serious illnesses, resulting in death 100% of the time. And what does this have to do with the death ray known as "second-hand" smoke?

Can you cite a scientific study that proves that heavy exposure to second-hand smoke is hamless?

Abstract of WHO Study on Second-Hand Smoke

44 posted on 05/08/2007 5:46:15 PM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Madame Dufarge
You have obviously never worked in the hospitality industry. And judging from the demeanor of your responses, you are not qualified.

...subjects up to 74 years of age were interviewed about exposure to ETS

Sorry, an interview is not an accurate measurement of exposure. The study relies on memories and hearsay and is influenced by the biases and prejudices of the respondents.

We did find weak evidence of a dose-response relationship between risk of lung cancer and exposure to spousal and workplace ETS

Did you bother to read the last sentence?

And what does this have to do with the death ray known as "second-hand" smoke?

I would defend your right to smoke, and live your life as you see fit. Respect my right to do the same. We all choose our risks and balance them against the rewards. The calculations are personal and you should not force your choice on others.

45 posted on 05/08/2007 7:48:37 PM PDT by NY.SS-Bar9 (DR #1692 P100 in 07?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: gargoyle
...Some news for nonsmokers. Everyday nonsmokers pass away... Just like those that smoke cigarettes...

And they think that they will die peacefully, kind of like Melanie Wilkes in Gone With the Wind. Just go to sleep after a routine day.

For the past 5 years, I've worked in a nursing home and then a hospital and have witnessed the last days of many people. Trust me, most don't go with a serene smile on their face. Smokers and non-smokers alike.

46 posted on 05/08/2007 9:10:10 PM PDT by 3catsanadog (Vote for the person at the primaries; vote for the party at the election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

Still at it, eh Gabz? You’ll get all of these laws nationwide overturned if it’s the last thing you do. Ciggie dangling from your lips, you courageously pound out post after post bemoaning the dastardly effects of majority rule.

The solution is so simple, though. Just get an extra sentence tacked on to the equal rights amendment! It’s sure to pass one of these days and just a couple of words—”and our smoking friends, too” should do the trick. With a constitutional amendment, you and your smokin buddies will be protected as the beleagered minority you really are.


47 posted on 05/09/2007 7:51:51 AM PDT by at bay ("We actually did an evil....." Eric Schmidt, CEO Google)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson