Replies

Right now I'm leaning heavily toward Hunter, but since he's not going anywhere...

Only if you believe libmedia is doing us a favor in accurately reporting these polls.

I think it's very possible that Hunter is emerging from the second tier of candidates. But I do recall how often they cited in the 1988 race that no sitting vice president had been elected in something like 150 years. It was very comparable to the length of time since we had elected a congressman as president. But somehow, they failed in 2000 to mention how only one sitting VP had been elected in the last 160 years. Funny how that works, isn't it? Their enthusiasm for history is strangely selective.

Libmedia is not our friend. We have seen, over and over, that they use these polls and the historical data against us.

Stick with your candidate unless you see someone just as conservative and/or more electable. Don't let libmedia's poll-manipulation turn you away from your own candidate. Especially not this early.

They are not our friends. And after 2004, who can doubt they will not fabricate anything they can get away with?

Only if you believe libmedia is doing us a favor in accurately reporting these polls.

I'm not just basing it on polling...I think MSM polling means nothing. He isn't doing anything. No effective fundraising, no serious campaign appearances...and if the MSM is lying, let's say his numbers are five times what theyre saying he's got. That wouldn't even beat Thompson, and he's not even in yet!

Conservatives will not support a guy who won't show he can beat Hillary, no matter what his ideology is. He needs to find first gear ASAP.