It appears evident that MHGinTN doesn’t want to play your game.
Let me answer. Romney took an oath swearing everything he had...or will have to the furthering of God’s Kingdom on Earth. Now we are all very aware that Mormonism teaches that Mormonism will propel this Kingdom....and they are talking specifically about the Chruch of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints when they speak of Gods Kingdom, and that Romney is a fomer ecclisiastical leader in his Church.
So was he lying then, or would he be lying now if he said that it was his oath to do all he could in furthering God’s Kingdom (Mormon Church) on Earth.
If he then took an oath to uphold the Constitution and the court sent down a ruling in opposition to the Chruch, where would his loyalties lie. With his previous Temple oath or his new Presidential oath. I see a potential conflict. Do you not?
Christians dedicate all they are and all they have in service to God. I see no difference. Does that mean we shouldn't elect Christians, in your view?
I see a potential conflict. Do you not?
One could say there would be a conflict between a Christian president and a ruling handed down by a court. In fact, I have heard some say that. So. . .would you say a Christan should not be elected President?