Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

They Shoot Mormons, Don't They? Religious Bigotry, alive and well today
Saundra Duffy

Posted on 05/04/2007 5:46:36 AM PDT by Saundra Duffy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 721-740741-760761-780 ... 2,981-2,983 next last
To: sevenbak

I thought they were talking specifically about a Christian assembly where Mormons were passed over. Who is Mrs. Dobson? Sorry I assumed she was the leader of a Christian organization.

If it was a govenment assembly and Mormons are NEVER asked to pray I would be interested in seeing a like.


741 posted on 05/06/2007 6:51:49 AM PDT by colorcountry (An Honest Man will change his thoughts to match the truth and a Dishonest Man will change the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 693 | View Replies]

To: sevenbak

Do you know how many McTemples there now are? Did you tell those poor Africans about the teaching of Prophet John Taylor, that God put blacks on earth to represent Satan? I doubt it....it wouldn’t be good PR.


742 posted on 05/06/2007 6:57:05 AM PDT by colorcountry (An Honest Man will change his thoughts to match the truth and a Dishonest Man will change the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 704 | View Replies]

To: sevenbak
I wonder how many people care about ANY statement by ANY religious leader back in those days when discrimination happened as a matter of course.

Try telling Al Sharkton and Jesse Jackson that. I guess you don't stay current with the world. Any statement by ANY leader OTHER than a democrat will guarantee a major hearing in the MSM. And Don Imus wasn't even a leader.

743 posted on 05/06/2007 6:57:11 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Fred sez "I'm not interested in being the tallest midget in the room.." RUN FRED RUN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 695 | View Replies]

To: sevenbak
greyfoxx39 asked: Are women allowed to offer the prayers over the sacrament in the LDS church yet? They weren't when I was a member, nor were they allowed to offer the opening or closing prayer in Sacrament meeting.

Sevenbaks answer: Women say prayers all the time in Sacrament meeting. The blessing of the sacrament is a priesthood function though, so no, they don't. It would seem your attempt to pigeonhole the LDS as discriminating would also work against the early Church. Are you sure you want to go there? The LDS do not hold these traditions like the early saints did, but you seem to be wanting us to go back to times of old!

Prayers in Sacrament meeting are different than "prayers over the sacrament." You know this very well and yet your answer was quite deceptive don't you think? Women are not and have never been able to perform the sacramental prayer (as greyfoxx put it - "over the sacrament") and you know it. Do you think it is honest to answer questions in a deceptive way?

744 posted on 05/06/2007 7:02:30 AM PDT by colorcountry (An Honest Man will change his thoughts to match the truth and a Dishonest Man will change the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 690 | View Replies]

To: sevenbak; Saundra Duffy; colorcountry
It would seem your attempt to pigeonhole the LDS as discriminating would also work against the early Church.

Perhaps you'd better tred different waters?

Saundra's statement was this: "Finally, let me ask you, would you draw the line at letting anybody lead your group in prayer?" WHICH I noted in my post.

My question still stands: Saundra, just curious here. Are women allowed to offer the prayers over the sacrament in the LDS church yet? They weren't when I was a member, nor were they allowed to offer the opening or closing prayer in Sacrament meeting.

I'm sure she can answer for herself, BTW.

When the LDS allows women deacons and elders, as many "mainstream" Christian churches do, you may invite me to "tred" different waters. I don't think you wish to get into the whole subject of the role of mormon women as second-class citizens in the mormon church.

As an aside, the mormon church's attempt to portray itself as "mainstream" would be boosted in the eyes of women if they moved away from THAT practice of the early church.

Color, perhaps you would care to comment on this conversation?

745 posted on 05/06/2007 7:13:57 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Fred sez "I'm not interested in being the tallest midget in the room.." RUN FRED RUN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 690 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

I thought it was funny (sad) in the last general conference when the Prophet Gordon B. Hinkley stated that his wife was his most prized possession.

LDS people may not even recognize how ludicrous and offensive statements like this are to the rest of Christianity.

Perhaps if there is enough political fallout over sexual discrimination in the LDS Church, there will be....voila.....a NEW REVELATION! Only if things get very, very uncomfortable for the Church however. How can you keep women in line if they think they can actually give healing blessings to their own children?

But I’ve already been accused of being a despised “feminist” which is hilarious considering I am married for 24 years to a very traditional Hispanic gentleman. We firmly hold to our traditional rolls in our household....(just in case one of you wants to impugn me by suggesting I am a “man hater.)


746 posted on 05/06/2007 7:28:09 AM PDT by colorcountry (An Honest Man will change his thoughts to match the truth and a Dishonest Man will change the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 745 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser; sevenbak; tantiboh; Saundra Duffy; restornu; colorcountry; Pan_Yans Wife; FastCoyote; ..
I for one am ashamed that my actions may have had some part in goading him to take the actions that got him banned.<

NNN if you are reading, I am sorry.

DU, there are going to be a lot of questions about Romney's faith before this is over with. There are going to be a lot of HARD questions, and there are going to be a lot of what you will see as aspersions, lies, slander, etc. coming from sources other than the family of FR.

You have taken on the role of "defender of the faith" here, and as you state in your post above "I for one am ashamed that my actions may have had some part in goading him to take the actions that got him banned." you have been quick to take offense, quick to goad, and quick to ping the mod. I congratulate you for stepping up and owning your mistakes. All of us on these various threads have at times made mistakes.

It is MY belief that you and others do your side no favor by constantly taking posts as personal affronts. There is room for a snide little remark occasionally, or a heated reaction to an individual statement, but most of us non or former (please, drop the "anti" stuff!) mormons are as fervent in our belief about the LDS church as you are.

We are not going to convert each other, and I think we should ALL keep in mind that EACH side has the SAME right to put forth the facts AS WE SEE THEM before the other people that are reading the thread. We are all missionaries in one way or the other. It is up to the individual reading our posts to make an informed decision on the merits.

So, I am requesting that we ALL consider the banning of Needle Nose Neely as a lesson, and think twice, no SIX times before making that personal attack or pinging the mod. And I wish NNN were allowed to come back.

747 posted on 05/06/2007 7:56:24 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Fred sez "I'm not interested in being the tallest midget in the room.." RUN FRED RUN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 684 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian
Of course we should have a special relationship with Jesus, we are even commanded to, but we are not told to pray to him. Jesus gave us very implicit instructions into how we pray:

“When ye pray, say, Our Father which art in heaven,”

If you know of a different commandment to pray a different way, I’ld love to see it?

We are told to pray in His name, but not pray TO Him. That said, the faithful followers of him, from whatever religion they are, that pray to him are still heard, I have no doubt.

748 posted on 05/06/2007 7:58:22 AM PDT by sevenbak (A LIE travels around the world while the TRUTH is still putting on its boots -Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 570 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39
Good Grief Greyfoxx! How many times are you going to post that? The horse burgers are on the grill!

Oaths and covenants made by members of the Church in the temples are no greater threat to our nation than are the oaths made by Masons in their ceremonies. Did you know there have been 15 Presidents who were Masons? Did they circumvent the Constitution or will of the people because of their rites, oaths and covenants? I think George Washington would disagree with you!

MASONIC PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES

George Washington, 1st President, 1789 - 1797, Commanding General during American Revolution, made a Mason August 4, 1753, in Fredericksburg Lodge (now No. 4), A. F. & A. M., Fredericksburg, Virginia.
James Monroe, 5th President, 1817 - 1825, made a Mason November 9, 1775, in Williamsburg Lodge (now No. 6), A.F. & A.M., Williamsburg, Virginia.
Andrew Jackson, 7th President, 1829 - 1837 Harmony Lodge No. 1, Nashville, Tennessee, an Honorary Member of Federal Lodge No. 1, F. & A.M., Washington, D.C., and Jackson Lodge No. 1, F. & A.M., Tallahassee, Florida. In 1822 and 1823 he served as the Grand Master of Masons in Tennessee.
James Knox Polk, 11th President, 1845 - 1849, made a Mason September 4, 1820, in Columbia Lodge No. 31, F. & A.M., Columbia, Tennessee.
James Buchanan, 15th President, 1857 - 1861, made a Mason January 24, 1817, in Lodge No. 43 (it has no name), F. & A.M., Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
Andrew Johnson, 17th President, 1865 - 1869, made a Mason during May, 1851, in Greeneville Lodge No. 119 (now No. 3), F. & A.M., Greeneville, Tennessee.
James Abram Garfield, 20th President. 1881, made a Mason November 22, 1864, in Columbus Lodge No. 30 F. & A.M., Columbus, Ohio.
William McKinley, 25th President, 1897 - 1901, made a Mason May 3, 1865, in Hiram Lodge No. 21, A.F. & A.M., Winchester, Virginia.
Theodore Roosevelt, 26th President, 1901 - 1909, made a Mason April 24, 1901, in Matinecock Lodge No. 806, F. & A.M., Oyster Bay, New York.
William Howard Taft, 27th President, 1909 - 1913 - Chief Justice Supreme Court 1921 - 1930, made a “Mason at Sight” in an “Occassional Lodge” called for that purpose on February 18, 1909, in the Scottish Rite Cathedral, Cincinnati, Ohio, by Charles S. Hoskinson, Grand Master of Masons in Ohio.
Warren Gamaliel Harding, 29th President, 1921 - 1923, made a Mason August 27, 1920, in Marion Lodge No. 70, F. & A.M., Marion, Ohio.
Franklin Delano Roosevelt, 32nd President, 1933 - 1945, made a Mason November 28, 1911, in Holland Lodge No. 8, F. & A.M., New York, New York, the same Lodge in which George Washington, the Nation’s first President, held Honorary membership.
Harry S. Truman, 33rd President, 1945 - 1951, made a Mason March 18, 1909, in Belton Lodge No. 450, A.F. & A.M., Belton, Missouri. He served as the Grand Master of Masons of Missouri in 1940.
Initiated: February 9, 1909, Belton Lodge No. 450, Belton, Missouri.
In 1911, several Members of Belton Lodge separated to establish Grandview Lodge No. 618, Grandview, Missouri, and Brother Truman served as its first Worshipful Master. At the Annual Session of the Grand Lodge of Missouri, September 24-25, 1940, Brother Truman was elected (by a landslide) the ninety-seventh Grand Master of Masons of Missouri, and served until October 1, 1941. Brother and President Truman was made a Sovereign Grand Inspector General, 33º, and Honorary Member, Supreme Council on October 19,1945 at the Supreme Council A.A.S.R. Southern Jurisdiction Headquarters in Washington D.C., upon which occasion he served as Exemplar (Representative) for his Class. He was also elected an Honorary Grand Master of the International Supreme Council, Order of DeMolay. On May 18, 1959, Brother and Former President Truman was presented with a fifty-year award, the only U.S. President to reach that golden anniversary in Freemasonry.
Gerald R. Ford, Jr. 38th President, 1974 - 1977. He was raised to the Sublime degree of Master Mason on May 18, 1951 in Columbia Lodge No. 3, F. &.A.M., of Washington, D.C., as a courtesy for Malta Lodge No. 465, F. & A.M. of Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Lyndon Baines Johnson 1908-1973. 36th President, 1963 - 1969. Entered Apprentice degree Johnson City Lodge No. 561, Johnson City, Texas October 30, 1937. Did not advance.

749 posted on 05/06/2007 8:08:53 AM PDT by sevenbak (A LIE travels around the world while the TRUTH is still putting on its boots -Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 574 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39
If Romney gets the nomination, the hounds of hell (meaning the Clinton machine) will be set loose on him through the mainstream media and the Republicans will go down in flames, White House, House and Senate.

Is that a prophecy? ;-)

750 posted on 05/06/2007 8:13:20 AM PDT by sevenbak (A LIE travels around the world while the TRUTH is still putting on its boots -Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 579 | View Replies]

To: sevenbak
Is that a prophecy? ;-)

More a "burning in the bosom". ;-)

751 posted on 05/06/2007 8:27:51 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Fred sez "I'm not interested in being the tallest midget in the room.." RUN FRED RUN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 750 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39
NNN has been banned, I’m sure you’re very happy to know. Seems someone hit the abuse button on him or something.

Why do you think the abuse button was hit? It seemed very clear that the Mod told him to knock it off, and 2 of his posts were pulled. Does he have no accountability in your mind?

752 posted on 05/06/2007 8:28:11 AM PDT by sevenbak (A LIE travels around the world while the TRUTH is still putting on its boots -Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 591 | View Replies]

To: tantiboh
If the Clintons and MSM go after Romney on the basis of religion, they will be walking on a shaking tightrope. I give it ten-to-one odds it’ll backfire.

I wish I had your confidence. I'll take your ten to one odds.

753 posted on 05/06/2007 8:29:53 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Fred sez "I'm not interested in being the tallest midget in the room.." RUN FRED RUN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 611 | View Replies]

To: tantiboh
What you fail to understand, greyfoxx, is that the Kingdom of God and Zion are spiritual organizations, referring to the LDS Church itself. This oath has nothing to do with politics or nations. It means being willing to serve in the Church and help to build it up.

Nice try.

754 posted on 05/06/2007 8:32:34 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Fred sez "I'm not interested in being the tallest midget in the room.." RUN FRED RUN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 608 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry
FARMS and FAIR are not official sites, or haven’t you been notified?

FARMS is not FARMS anymore. If the new name is not more of an endorsement than the old, I don't know what is:


755 posted on 05/06/2007 8:32:42 AM PDT by sevenbak (A LIE travels around the world while the TRUTH is still putting on its boots -Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 593 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39
Well I guess we had that with clinton...just who do you have in mind now? I don't have the ability, myself, to enter into the hearts of the candidates and see their relationship with a higher power.

Well, you were talking about being wary of anyone who had a higher allegiance than the US, that should include anyone of any faith for their faith in God should, at least in my mind, come first or else exactly why are they swearing on the bible?

I DO have the personal experience of being exposed to the attitudes of mormons who consider that "holding the priesthood" makes them very special and devoted to the mormon church, because they believe that their salvation lies therein...

I understand why you think Mormons believe their salvation lies whith the church, the Catholics that I have known feel the same way about being members of the Catholic church. You seem to think the Mormons believe that the church on earth has the ability to grant them salvation. Mormons do not believe this, but the church on earth is the line of authority through which God will tell them what they should be doing in this day and age. If you go to the LDS.org site and look at conference talks, you will find talks on the use of computers, email, chat rooms, advice on TV and movies and how to stay pure in mind, the word of wisdom, council on being honest with your fellow man. Topics for a modern day that are applied in varying degrees in each Mormons life, just like born again or evangelicals apply the Bible differently in theirs.

you do the math: Loyalty to country=earthly plaudits...loyalty to the Mormon church=eternal salvation PLUS the admiration of their fellow Mormons.

Are you actually saying that the Prophet in SLC will call Mitt in the White House and tell him to veto or sign a specific bill, or that Mitt will use his Executive authority to grant the church some special ability? Like make it a state church?

I wish I could get you to see how crazy that sounds to me. A) The LDS church would never place such a call and B) Mitt would tell the prophet to butt out this is not a theocracy.

The church is governed by rules, and one of them is the Articles of Faith written by Joseph Smith himself. Article 12 states: “We believe in being subject to kings, presidents, rulers, and magistrates, in obeying, honoring, and sustaining the law.” To a Mormon this means he has already given an oath by promising God that he will obey his commands to “Honor and sustain the law” if you can’t trust him because he is willing ro keep the law, then who can you trust?

Your whole premise on this seems to be that a Mormon can’t be trusted because of his oath to God to build up the kingdom of God. I believe a Mormon would make a better president because of his commitment to both God and country.

On this we may just have to agree to disagree, but as a Mormon I can tell you that you have the effect of temple covenants on a Mormon’s life all wrong. It would be a good thing to have a president who believes in oath keeping and that the Constitution is and inspired document. Even though I am pulling for Fred Thompson, a president Romney would not be a bad thing from an trustworthiness perspective, but it would be something I worry about form a conservative one.

I do find it funny that you are worried about Mitt because he is “Too Mormon” and I am a Fred Thompson supporter because he is not Mormon enough (grin).
756 posted on 05/06/2007 8:36:48 AM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 737 | View Replies]

To: sevenbak
Oaths and covenants made by members of the Church in the temples are no greater threat to our nation than are the oaths made by Masons in their ceremonies. Did you know there have been 15 Presidents who were Masons? Did they circumvent the Constitution or will of the people because of their rites, oaths and covenants? I think George Washington would disagree with you!

When the MSM starts saying the same things I have here, that kind of argument will be useless. I don't know how I can impress on you the evil of the clinton machine. The message of the November election seems to have passed over the heads of a lot of people, but it scared the "heck" out of me.

757 posted on 05/06/2007 8:38:01 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Fred sez "I'm not interested in being the tallest midget in the room.." RUN FRED RUN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 749 | View Replies]

To: FastCoyote
That makes you an absolute moron

I thought we were avoiding name calling...
758 posted on 05/06/2007 8:38:53 AM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 739 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
I was a little flabbergasted over that "geography = political destiny" notion. Is it in the water or just a proximity to rugged mountain terrain?

ROTFL! I think it's the water.

759 posted on 05/06/2007 8:40:25 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Fred sez "I'm not interested in being the tallest midget in the room.." RUN FRED RUN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 581 | View Replies]

To: tantiboh
The LDS Church teaches that you must engage in faith AND repentance. “Faith without Works is dead, being alone.” In other words, if you say you follow Jesus, you’d better act like it.

Tant, that is a very broad interpretation of the passage. Is following Jesus therefore interpreted by you to include all the doctrine of the mormon church, including the three degrees of glory, the "man will become God" theory, the requirement to obey the WOW, the garment thing etc.

I am not a thelogian here, but from a logical point of view, statements that "following Jesus" means all that are part of what Christians deplore.

760 posted on 05/06/2007 8:47:31 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Fred sez "I'm not interested in being the tallest midget in the room.." RUN FRED RUN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 582 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 721-740741-760761-780 ... 2,981-2,983 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson